Reconsidering Value and Labour in the Digital Age 2015
DOI: 10.1057/9781137478573_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Contribution to a Critique of the Concept Playbour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Neoliberal instrumental reason and the justification of the market undermine the nature of play and transform it into a purely productive model, leaving out any sense of emancipation or freedom (Harvey, 2011;Hearn, 1976;Mirowski & Plehwe, 2015). The problematics of play collapsing into the playbour has been discussed elsewhere at length (Fuchs, 2016;Hesmondhalgh & Baker, 2013;Lund, 2015). Still, here it should be noted that fundamentally it is exploitative and morally reprehensible to transform leisure activities into work activities.…”
Section: Critical and Ecological Theories Of Playful Researchmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Neoliberal instrumental reason and the justification of the market undermine the nature of play and transform it into a purely productive model, leaving out any sense of emancipation or freedom (Harvey, 2011;Hearn, 1976;Mirowski & Plehwe, 2015). The problematics of play collapsing into the playbour has been discussed elsewhere at length (Fuchs, 2016;Hesmondhalgh & Baker, 2013;Lund, 2015). Still, here it should be noted that fundamentally it is exploitative and morally reprehensible to transform leisure activities into work activities.…”
Section: Critical and Ecological Theories Of Playful Researchmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This essay is not about playbour or gamification. Academic research can and should be playful as productive, not to the exclusion of work, nor in the neoliberal construction of work as play, which is deeply problematic (Lund, 2015;Sandoval et al, 2014). Neoliberal instrumental reason and the justification of the market undermine the nature of play and transform it into a purely productive model, leaving out any sense of emancipation or freedom (Harvey, 2011;Hearn, 1976;Mirowski & Plehwe, 2015).…”
Section: Critical and Ecological Theories Of Playful Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This unproblematised intermixing of external and intrinsic motivations has met with radical critique. Making a crucial distinction between playing and gaming, Lund contends that gaming (and gamification) introduce an instrumental and exploitive capitalist logic into playing that (by definition) is non-instrumental and joyful (Lund 2015a;2015b;.…”
Section: Gamification and "Sharification"mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the former the goal is the activity itself; in the latter the production of useful values is important. On the other hand, we have gaming and labouring; both valorise results that can be measured and compared (Lund 2014;2015a;.…”
Section: The Problematic Bildung and Socialitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the digital age, the differentiation between work and play gradually disappears and dissolves into playbor (Lund 2015), and while doing so, it encodes the Protestant and capital-oriented logic of a productive human existence into play. As much as play enters the allegedly play-free domains of life, such as the workspace, seemingly non-ludic practices pervade playgrounds.…”
Section: Work and Play Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%