2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A contribution for the quantification of the influence of windows on the airtightness of Southern European buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It includes the infiltrations plus the ventilation through the use of the windows. Additionally, we considered the following values for the infiltration air flow rate per internal volume through the envelope (n50), both in HULC and Design Builder: 5.72 h −1 for scenario 0 (original building), as reported by Fernández-Agüera et al [41] for multifamily social housing in Mediterranean Europe, and 4.91 h −1 for the improved scenarios (1 to 4), since according to Almeida et al [42], the average window contribution for the room permeability is 15% and we changed windows with air permeability of 50 m 3 /h•m 2 to 3 m 3 /h•m 2 (a reduction of 94%). Night ventilation of four renovations per hour during summer was considered in the two software tools, since all the studied buildings allow for crossed ventilation.…”
Section: Methodology To Estimate Energy Use Co 2 Emissions and Thermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It includes the infiltrations plus the ventilation through the use of the windows. Additionally, we considered the following values for the infiltration air flow rate per internal volume through the envelope (n50), both in HULC and Design Builder: 5.72 h −1 for scenario 0 (original building), as reported by Fernández-Agüera et al [41] for multifamily social housing in Mediterranean Europe, and 4.91 h −1 for the improved scenarios (1 to 4), since according to Almeida et al [42], the average window contribution for the room permeability is 15% and we changed windows with air permeability of 50 m 3 /h•m 2 to 3 m 3 /h•m 2 (a reduction of 94%). Night ventilation of four renovations per hour during summer was considered in the two software tools, since all the studied buildings allow for crossed ventilation.…”
Section: Methodology To Estimate Energy Use Co 2 Emissions and Thermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution of natural ventilation is also significant, and airtight frames for glazing systems are more and more adopted, in order to reduce energy consumption [4][5][6][7][8]. Almeida et al [9] showed that the windows' permeability indices can have a very wide range of variability (from 4.8 to 96.4 m 3 /h m 2 ), due to the year of construction, the frame material, and the opening system. Nevertheless, if the airtightness performance is too high, it can contribute to deteriorating indoor air quality (IAQ), due to the less air exchange [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Windows are indispensable construction units for building facades, given their implications for basic aspects related to habitability and comfort such as watertightness [1], air permeability [2], lighting [3], etc. At the same time, these openings interrupt the continuity of external walls and amount to numerous singularities in the construction solution that still need to meet all requirements of the envelope, without decreasing the performance of the whole.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%