A contrast between DEMATEL-ANP and ANP methods for six sigma project selection: a case study in healthcare industry

Abstract

BackgroundThe project selection process is a crucial step for healthcare organizations at the moment of implementing six sigma programs in both administrative and caring processes. However, six-sigma project selection is often defined as a decision making process with interaction and feedback between criteria; so that it is necessary to explore different methods to help healthcare companies to determine the Six-sigma projects that provide the maximum benefits. This paper describes the application of both ANP (Analytic Network process) and DEMATEL (Decision Making trial and evaluation laboratory)-ANP in a public medical centre to establish the most suitable six sigma project and finally, these methods were compared to evaluate their performance in the decision making process.MethodsANP and DEMATEL-ANP were used to evaluate 6 six sigma project alternatives under an evaluation model composed by 3 strategies, 4 criteria and 15 sub-criteria. Judgement matrixes were completed by the six sigma team whose participants worked in different departments of the medical centre.ResultsThe improving of care opportunity in obstetric outpatients was elected as the most suitable six sigma project with a score of 0,117 as contribution to the organization goals. DEMATEL-ANP performed better at decision making process since it reduced the error probability due to interactions and feedback.ConclusionsANP and DEMATEL-ANP effectively supported six sigma project selection processes, helping to create a complete framework that guarantees the prioritization of projects that provide maximum benefits to healthcare organizations. As DEMATEL- ANP performed better, it should be used by practitioners involved in decisions related to the implementation of six sigma programs in healthcare sector accompanied by the adequate identification of the evaluation criteria that support the decision making model. Thus, this comparative study contributes to choosing more effective approaches in this field. Suggestions of further work are also proposed so that these methods can be applied more adequate in six sigma project selection processes in healthcare.

Development of Decision Support Model for Selecting a Maintenance Plan Using a Fuzzy MCDM Approach: A Theoretical Framework

“…The model used by Büyüközkan and Güleryüz is a good model for the problem presented; however, there is no need to establish complex correlations through using ANP and DEMATEL for the current study problem. A study that compared using a hybrid of DEMATEL-ANP with ANP to select a project for healthcare organizations with six sigma alternatives [38] recommended using DEMATEL-ANP hybrid as the feedback after implementation is taken into consideration. Nevertheless, the selection of a healthcare project is very complex as it considers medical and administrative aspects.…”

Identifying Influencing Factors of Audit Risk Model: A Combined Fuzzy ANP-DEMATEL Approach

“…During applying ANP, the relationship among criteria (factors) should be properly determined. Although, ANP provides the evaluation of the influence and interdependence of the factors, sometimes, this not clear by decision makers (Ortíz et al, 2015). Accordingly, even though ANP has been successfully applied in many fields, the related studies deal imperfectly and incompletely with inner dependences.…”

Identifying Key Factors Related to the Resource Allocation in the Health Sector of the Iranian Oil Industry: Application of DEMATEL Method

“…DEMATEL is a mathematical multi-criteria approach that analyzes the relationships between a set of factors and attempts to identify causal relationships among them (15). Globally, different studies used this technique to solve health problems at various levels (6,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24). For instance, this technique alone or combined with other methods is used to identify key factors influencing the quality of hospital services, developing strategies for improving the performance of general hospitals (17), identifying key performance indicators for hospital management (18), to select allied hospitals in outpatient services (22), to analyze associations and to prioritize the social factors affecting health (23), and to prioritize the compensation mechanisms for nurses working in the emergency department (24).…”