2009
DOI: 10.1002/nme.2745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A continuum‐to‐atomistic bridging domain method for composite lattices

Abstract: SUMMARYThe bridging domain method is an overlapping domain decomposition approach for coupling finite element continuum models and molecular mechanics models. In this method, the total energy is decomposed into atomistic and continuum parts by complementary weight functions applied to each part of the energy in the coupling domain. To enforce compatibility, the motions of the coupled atoms are constrained by the continuum displacement field using Lagrange multipliers. For composite lattices, this approach is s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Promising approaches based on a concurrent coupling of a fine-scale model in the regions where fracture/dislocations occur with homogenized models elsewhere were presented. [64][65][66][67] Alternative methods propose to reduce the computational expense through algebraic model reduction. [68][69][70][71] Ultimately, these approaches aim at permitting to study structures of engineering relevance at an affordable computational cost.…”
Section: Mechanical Models Of Graphenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Promising approaches based on a concurrent coupling of a fine-scale model in the regions where fracture/dislocations occur with homogenized models elsewhere were presented. [64][65][66][67] Alternative methods propose to reduce the computational expense through algebraic model reduction. [68][69][70][71] Ultimately, these approaches aim at permitting to study structures of engineering relevance at an affordable computational cost.…”
Section: Mechanical Models Of Graphenementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25,9,26,2,24,32,21]), and the corresponding coupled methods for crystalline materials (cf. [39,7,23,10,8,4,3,5,6,15,14,36,17,16,27,30,18,19,20,35,28,37,38,43,44,1,22,34,35,42,41]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In composite lattices, the secondary lattice atoms should still remain free of BDM constraints to allow internal relaxation, as mentioned earlier. However, we maintain the conventional averaging weighting scheme described earlier instead of adopting the scheme developed in , which is limited in its applicability to nearest‐neighbor interactions. We accomplish the same equilibrium effect by applying forces asymmetrically, that is, between atoms existing on the primary and secondary sublattices, the force applied is falsemml-overlinef¯αMathClass-rel={falsenonefalsearrayarrayleftwMathClass-open(Xα,XβMathClass-close)fαarrayleftαprimary latticearrayleftfαarrayleftαsecondary latticeMathClass-punc.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulties of suppressing spurious wave reflection at the interfaces are addressed by Xu and Belytschko [11]. Additionally, the BDM has been extended for coupling with composite lattices such as graphene [12], which can be complicated for interface coupling methods. Similar approaches include the bridging scales method [13][14][15].The traditional multiscale methods described earlier are ineffective when applied to moving, branching, or expanding defects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%