2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2006.11.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A continuum constitutive model for cohesionless granular flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2. The assumptions (34) are based on the observations that at an equilibrium state no production appear. Substituting (34) 1;2 respectively into (7) and (8) leads to the results that (8) is automatically satisfied, and (7) reduces to r Á Cj E ¼ 0.…”
Section: Equilibrium Constitutive Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2. The assumptions (34) are based on the observations that at an equilibrium state no production appear. Substituting (34) 1;2 respectively into (7) and (8) leads to the results that (8) is automatically satisfied, and (7) reduces to r Á Cj E ¼ 0.…”
Section: Equilibrium Constitutive Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the revised Goodman-Cowin model), in which the second time derivative of m is used, is more appropriate to take into account the microstructural effects of the short-term instantaneous inelastic collision (rapid flow) [9]. Theoretical models to slow and dense laminar flows [9,12,[21][22][23], and for rapid laminar flows [9,[15][16][17][18][19][20][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] have been developed. Of particular interest are the extensions of the Wilmánski and revised Goodman-Cowin models for slow and rapid turbulent flows, respectively, in which the distributions of the turbulent kinetic energy and turbulent dissipation are found to be similar to those of Newtonian fluids in turbulent boundary layer flows [35][36][37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these findings were not taken into account in purely laminar formulations, e.g. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], they were not accounted for in the limiting turbulent formulations, e.g. [23][24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Their interpretation [31] is based upon an extension of the plane shearing models by DaCruz et al [32] and Jop et al [33]. Their resembles earlier models by Tardos et al [25] and Soller et al [28] in many respects, because it involves surface integrals over b) The cylinder of rotation for estimating the torque is the vane diameter augmented by a particle diameter, D + d, and the immersion depth augmented by a particle radius, z + d/2.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%