2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.08.28.267468
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Continuous Time Representation of smFRET for the Extraction of Rapid Kinetics

Abstract: Our goal is to learn kinetic rates from single molecule FRET (smFRET) data even if these exceed the data acquisition rate. To achieve this, we develop a variant of our recently proposed hidden Markov jump process (HMJP) with which we learn transition kinetics from parallel measurements in donor and acceptor channels. Our HMJP generalizes the hidden Markov model (HMM) paradigm in two critical ways: (1) it deals with physical smFRET systems as they switch between conformational states in continuous time; (2) it … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(171 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is common practice to analyze photon arrival data to extract kinetics under continuous illumination by binning the data and subsequently using hidden Markov models (HMMs) 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 . As noise distributions are better characterized in unprocessed data, it remains conceptually preferred, though more computationally costly, to use photon-by-photon methods [ 13 , 14 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is common practice to analyze photon arrival data to extract kinetics under continuous illumination by binning the data and subsequently using hidden Markov models (HMMs) 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 . As noise distributions are better characterized in unprocessed data, it remains conceptually preferred, though more computationally costly, to use photon-by-photon methods [ 13 , 14 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is common practice to analyze photon arrival data to extract kinetics under continuous illumination by binning the data and subsequently using hidden Markov models (HMMs) [16][17][18][19]. As noise distributions are better characterized in unprocessed data, it remains conceptually preferred, though more computationally costly, to use photon-by-photon methods [13,14,[20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is common practice to analyze photon arrival data to extract kinetics under continuous illumination by binning the data and subsequently using hidden Markov models (HMMs) [1619]. As noise distributions are better characterized in unprocessed data, it remains conceptually preferred, though more computationally costly, to use photon-by-photon methods [13, 14, 2024].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11][12][13] ), but the challenge, then, is to choose the right dynamical model out of the multitude of possibilities 5 . Data-driven Bayesian inference models of single-molecule time series have enjoyed considerable success in recent years [14][15][16][17][18][19] , but they usually require physical insight in order to constrain the space of possible models, and they, too, often assume that the observed dynamics is a one-dimensional random walk even if the number of discrete states is not specified a priori.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%