1993
DOI: 10.3792/pjaa.69.77
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A continuation principle for the $3$-D Euler equations for incompressible fluids in a bounded domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that this error was derived from the pointwise error of the velocity field and hence is likely an overestimate of the true error. The existence of a finite-time singularity is confirmed using the well-known Beale-Kato-Majda (BKM) criterion (4,6,7). It asserts that a smooth solution of the 3D Euler equations blows up at time t s if and only if the maximum vorticity kωk ∞ accumulates so fast in time that…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that this error was derived from the pointwise error of the velocity field and hence is likely an overestimate of the true error. The existence of a finite-time singularity is confirmed using the well-known Beale-Kato-Majda (BKM) criterion (4,6,7). It asserts that a smooth solution of the 3D Euler equations blows up at time t s if and only if the maximum vorticity kωk ∞ accumulates so fast in time that…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The finite-time blowup problem has been studied extensively from both mathematical and numerical points of view. On the mathematical side, a number of useful blowup/nonblowup criteria have been obtained over the years, which have greatly facilitated the numerical search of a finite-time singularity (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10). On the numerical side, interesting numerical simulations suggesting the existence of a finite-time singularity have been reported from time to time (see, for example, refs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difficulty in the analysis lies in the presence of the nonlinear vortex stretching term and the lack of a regularization mechanism, which implies that even the local well-posedness of the equations can only be established for sufficiently smooth initial data (see, for example, [37]). Despite these difficulties, a few important partial results [3,44,22,46,19,20,25] have been obtained over the years which have led to improved understanding of the regularity properties of the 3D Euler. More specifically, the celebrated theorem of Beale, Kato, and Majda [3] and its variants [22,46] characterize the regularity of the 3D Euler equations in terms of the maximum vorticity, asserting that a smooth solution u of (1.1) blows up at t = T if and only if…”
Section: Introduction the Celebrated Three-dimensional (3d) Incomprementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the methods in [1][2][3][4][5][6] could not be used here directly. We will use a well-known logarithmic Sobolev inequality in [8,9] to complete our proof. We will prove:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From now on we will drop the subscript e and throughout this section C will be a constant independent of > 0. First, we recall the following two lemmas in [8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%