1988
DOI: 10.5465/amr.1988.4306951
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Contingency View of Porter's “Generic Strategies”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
162
0
19

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 237 publications
(186 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
162
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…Este posicionamento tem lhe valido diversas críticas (e.g. : Murray, 1988;Hill, 1988;Miller e Dess, 1993); o próprio Porter (1980, p.53;1991, p.101) chegou a mencionar, numas poucas ocasiões e muito en passant, que seria viável a perseguição simultânea das estratégias de baixo custo e de diferenciação, dada uma determinada conjugação muito específica de circunstâncias.…”
Section: E E E E Estratégias Stratégias Stratégias Stratégias Stratégunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Este posicionamento tem lhe valido diversas críticas (e.g. : Murray, 1988;Hill, 1988;Miller e Dess, 1993); o próprio Porter (1980, p.53;1991, p.101) chegou a mencionar, numas poucas ocasiões e muito en passant, que seria viável a perseguição simultânea das estratégias de baixo custo e de diferenciação, dada uma determinada conjugação muito específica de circunstâncias.…”
Section: E E E E Estratégias Stratégias Stratégias Stratégias Stratégunclassified
“…Alguns autores defendem uma visão que eles intitulam de contingencial, segun-do a qual o conjunto de estratégias viáveis é limitado pelas características do ambiente (Hambrick, 1983b;Murray, 1988). Segundo Varadarajan (1985), determinadas estratégias somente conduzirão a desempenho superior em função de configurações particulares do ambiente, da estrutura da indústria, do comportamento do consumidor, das estruturas organizacionais e da disponibilidade de recursos.…”
Section: Abordagem Contingencial Abordagem Contingencial Abordagem Counclassified
“…It is conceivable that the analysis of organizational, macro-and micro-environmental and stakeholder factors is an ongoing process, and the implementation of a standardised marketing mix within the overall business approach is resource consuming [51,111]. Nevertheless, an understanding of the different factors influencing a standardised marketing mix allows marketers to direct resources and efforts more appropriately towards its successful management, and enhances long-term business performance resulting from economies of scale and higher stakeholder satisfaction [47]. Marketing managers must align the overall business approach with the marketing mix approach according to the suggestion that Standardization clearly improves export performance [6,112].…”
Section: Managerial Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, by the use of an adapted marketing mix, industrial sellers might achieve higher stakeholder satisfaction and achieve greater profitability (Theodosiou and Leonidou, 2003), but in terms of SMEs of the B2B sector, "significant paybacks are associated with Standardization" [6]. SMEs clearly prefer a standardised marketing mix, because due to economics of scale they are enabled to decrease the price while increasing quality and service [47]. Furthermore, marketing mix Standardization clearly improves export performance, particularly on B2B markets and when SMEs can take advantage of currency exchange rates between countries [48,49].…”
Section: Adaptation/ Standardization In B2b Marketsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the same circumstances, a service sector differentiation strategy would be even more difficult under cost constraints (Campbell-Hunt, 2000;Powers and Hahn, 2004). The second school advances the position that by adopting more than one strategy simultaneously it may be possible to achieve a sustainable advantage (Murray, 1988, Miller, 1992, Johnson and Scholes, 1993. This position assumes that differentiation through higher quality will increase the market share; therefore, the economy of scale would result in a decrease in the unit costs (Gupta, 1995).…”
Section: The Sources Of Competitive Advantagementioning
confidence: 99%