1996
DOI: 10.1080/00223980.1996.9914988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Contingency Approach to Understanding Negotiator Behavior as a Function of Worldmindedness and Expected Future Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because nationalism is related to national comparisons, as nationalism is a belief that one's own nation is superior to other nations and should be dominant in the world (Kosterman & Feshbach, 1989). Nationalism has also been found to be related to the choice of a conflict strategy in intergroup interaction situations (Dittloff & Harris, 1996). Nationalism during the Beijing Olympic Games highlighted national comparisons, particularly comparisons with the most relevant comparison targets and, therefore, appeared to intensify competitiveness towards those foreigners who are from the most relevant comparison nations (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is because nationalism is related to national comparisons, as nationalism is a belief that one's own nation is superior to other nations and should be dominant in the world (Kosterman & Feshbach, 1989). Nationalism has also been found to be related to the choice of a conflict strategy in intergroup interaction situations (Dittloff & Harris, 1996). Nationalism during the Beijing Olympic Games highlighted national comparisons, particularly comparisons with the most relevant comparison targets and, therefore, appeared to intensify competitiveness towards those foreigners who are from the most relevant comparison nations (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, nationalism, a dominance‐based ideology that emphasizes a sense of international superiority, tends to be related to intolerance of diversity, ethnocentrism, anti‐egalitarian values, and prejudice (e.g. Butz, Plant, & Doerr, 2007; Li & Brewer, 2004; Sidanius, Feshbach, Levin, & Pratto, 1997) as well as to a conflict strategy towards outgroups or outgroup members (Dittloff & Harris, 1996). Nationalists are more inclined to make national comparisons because superiority is the core of nationalism (Viki & Calitri, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Players were more cooperative in conditions of continued play than in the case of a single-shot interaction. Results from negotiation studies (Arnold & Carnevale, 1997;Ben-Yoav & Pruitt, 1984a, 1984bDittloff & Harris, 1996;Heide & Miner, 1992;Mannix, 1994;Mannix, Tinsley, & Bazerman, 1995;Pruitt & Rubin, 1986) also indicate that the expectation of a future interaction substantially affects social interaction. Generally, negotiators who expect a future relationship are more likely to engage in problem solving behaviors and less likely to behave contentiously than negotiators who do not expect to interact with each other again.…”
Section: Future Interaction Expectationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zejména pokud se jedná o pozici mezinárodnı́ho či globálnı́ho charakteru je osvědčené přijı́mat osoby s rozvinutějšı́m globálnı́m myšlenı́m (Brokaw, Achenreiner, Elfessi 2007). Rozšı́řenı́ původně výzkumných nástrojů i do této sféry lze vnı́mat jako důsledek výzkumů v oblasti mezinárodnı́ho obchodu, kdy napřı́klad Crowford a Lamb (1982) zjišťovali korelaci globálnı́ho myšlenı́ a touhy po koupi zahraničnı́ch produktů, podobně Kim a Littrel (1999) popisovali souvislost s nákupem suvenýrů z cest, Dittloff a Harris (1996) sledovali mı́ru globálnı́ho myšlenı́ a způsob vyjed-návánı́ a kooperace při dosahovánı́ dohod či studie (Crawford 1984, Boatler 1992, Boatler 1994) věnujı́cı́ se globálnı́mu myšlenı́ a způsobu práce zaměstnanců me-zinárodnı́ch korporacı́, náklonosti pracovat s kolegy jiných kultur atp. Zmı́něné studie tak mimo jiné akcentujı́ praktický rozměr globálnı́ho myšlenı́, který pak v modernı́m vzdělávánı́ podporuje význam rozvoje tohoto způsobu myšlenı́.…”
Section: Globální Myšlení Jako Výzkumné Témaunclassified