2022
DOI: 10.3390/rs14092276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Context Feature Enhancement Network for Building Extraction from High-Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery

Abstract: The complexity and diversity of buildings make it challenging to extract low-level and high-level features with strong feature representation by using deep neural networks in building extraction tasks. Meanwhile, deep neural network-based methods have many network parameters, which take up a lot of memory and time in training and testing. We propose a novel fully convolutional neural network called the Context Feature Enhancement Network (CFENet) to address these issues. CFENet comprises three modules: the spa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(55 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the WHU dataset, comparison experiments are conducted with Unet [47], DeepLabv3+ [48], PSPNet [49], Map-Net [50], BOMSC-net [28], DR-Net [51], MBR-HRNet [52], and CFENet [53] In the given roof material transformation case in (a), Unet and PSPnet exhibit considerable instances of false red classification, while MDBES-Net avoids semantically segregating metal shelves into buildings. For Row (b) medium to large buildings, BOMSC-net reveals more instances of missed blue areas for extended large buildings, while MDBES-Net provides a more comprehensive extraction for larger buildings.…”
Section: ) Analysis Of Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the WHU dataset, comparison experiments are conducted with Unet [47], DeepLabv3+ [48], PSPNet [49], Map-Net [50], BOMSC-net [28], DR-Net [51], MBR-HRNet [52], and CFENet [53] In the given roof material transformation case in (a), Unet and PSPnet exhibit considerable instances of false red classification, while MDBES-Net avoids semantically segregating metal shelves into buildings. For Row (b) medium to large buildings, BOMSC-net reveals more instances of missed blue areas for extended large buildings, while MDBES-Net provides a more comprehensive extraction for larger buildings.…”
Section: ) Analysis Of Experimental Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These methods are DR-Net, 30 ASLNet, 31 MAP-Net, 9 MultiBuild-Net, ? BOMSC-Net, 33 CFENet, 34 and MECNet. 18 The qualitative results are reported in Table 3 and Table 4.…”
Section: Comparison With Building Footprint Extraction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used the same settings in the InriaAIL dataset. We also cite recent work to validate the effectiveness of our method, namely CFENet [44]. Due to the limitation of GPU memory, we chose SST (RS18, S4) and HRNet-w30.…”
Section: A Experiments On Whu Building Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%