2020
DOI: 10.1109/tip.2019.2961480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Context-Aware Locality Measure for Inlier Pool Enrichment in Stepwise Image Registration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the third series of experiments, we conducted quantitative comparison with six state-of-the-art algorithms: GLPM [40], LPM [39], ICF [20], GS [58], LMR [52], and SIR [41]. Then, 27 pairs of yaw, pitch, and mixture scenarios in the dataset are used for testing.…”
Section: Results Of Comprehensive Quantitative Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In the third series of experiments, we conducted quantitative comparison with six state-of-the-art algorithms: GLPM [40], LPM [39], ICF [20], GS [58], LMR [52], and SIR [41]. Then, 27 pairs of yaw, pitch, and mixture scenarios in the dataset are used for testing.…”
Section: Results Of Comprehensive Quantitative Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the fourth series of experiments, considering the diversity of UAV images, we add an extreme scenario, in which not only rotation occurred, but also low overlap, distortion, and scaling are combined, thereby increasing the difficulty of registration. We conducted quantitative comparison of extreme scenarios with six state-of-the-art algorithms: GLPM [40], LPM [39], ICF [20], GS [58], LMR [52], SIR [41]. Then, 23 pairs of images on extreme scenarios were used for testing.…”
Section: Results Of Quantitative Comparison Of Extreme Scenariosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations