A contested landscape: Monuments, public memory, and post-Soviet identity in Stavropol’, Russia

Abstract

Much recent literature in cultural, political and social geography has considered the relationship between identity, memory, and the urban landscape. This paper interrogates such literature through exploring the complex materialisation of memorialisation in post-Soviet Russia. Using the example of the statue of General Alexei Ermolov in Stavropol’, an analysis of the cityscape reveals interethnic tensions over differing interpretations of the life and history of the person upon whom the statue is based. The existence of a rich literature on Ermolov and the Russian colonial experience in the North Caucasus helps to explain this. The symbolic cityscape of Stavropol’ plays an important role in interethnic relations in the multi-ethnic city; it is both an arena through which Russian identity is communicated with people and produced and reproduced, and an arena through which Russian citizens compete with each other for authority on historical narratives that operate at and between a number of scales. People’s readings of the cityscape can reveal much about power and space in contemporary Russia.

Contributing to the cultural ecosystem services and human wellbeing debate: a case study application on indicators and linkages

“…The principal component analysis also revealed that museums and monuments tend to group together in indicating wellbeing. This is probably due to their strong ability in representing cultural identity of the people (Mazumdar & Mazumdar 2004;Foxall 2013). Considering the highest weights for principal component one and two, components one seem to identify strongly with landscape aesthetics and naturalness, and component two seem to identify strongly with social, spiritual and mental tranquillity.…”

“…Monuments Monuments are physical symbols of real history and memory that connect the present to the past (Foxall 2013). They constitute memorials that are used to legitimize or sanctify historical personalities, groups or events in to the present social setup (Alderman & Dwyer 2009).…”

The Revival and Restructuring of a Traditional Folk Festival: Cultural Landscape and Memory in Guangzhou, South China

“…Many studies have found that due to the design disorder and a lack of collective memory during the landscape construction process, the culture of cities tended to be similar [27]. Recent work has focused on monumental landscape, from grand monuments [28], memorial rituals, places of memory [29] to museums [30]. Till studied the debate in the process of national memory reconstruction in Berlin, and believes that collective memory is built on the basis of personal and socially shared experiences [31].…”

Testing constructivism: why not more “Cossacks” in Krasnodar Kray?

“…Renowned for their skill in horseback riding and martial proficiency, the Cossacks were naturally suited to assisting in Russian military campaigns. The Cossacks were an important component of the armies of Aleksey Yermolov, a name that came to symbolize the brutality of the Russian war against the peoples of the mountains and still incites passionate contention today (Foxall 2013).…”