1966
DOI: 10.1111/j.1939-0025.1966.tb02288.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A content measure of changes attributable to psychotherapy.

Abstract: Comparison of scored content of first quarter with terminal quarter of 13 recorded psychotherapy sessions established significant differences between amounts of patient's sentence units relating to sex and evaluation of self. These content changes persisted in a follow-up interview, were classified as adaptive and were in the therapist's objectively determined goal areas.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1966
1966
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All the therapy sessions were recorded, with peimission, and the transcripts edited to remove peisonally identifying references The talk of the patient and therapist was divided into sentence units (Auld &. White, 1956) Two independent scorers assigned a category to each unit, an arbiter choosing the final score when the scorera disagreed The reliability of the four categories used was checked on one session randomlj selected from each of nine casts The two scorers agreed on 90.07% of 3,421 units (Phi coefficients for individual scoring categories have been reported m previous studies'- White et al, 1964White et al, , 1966 The frequency of each category was divided b\ thr total number of units of the patient's speech in each session. These percentage figures were then used to compute means foi groups of sessions or groups of patienti…”
Section: Scoring Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All the therapy sessions were recorded, with peimission, and the transcripts edited to remove peisonally identifying references The talk of the patient and therapist was divided into sentence units (Auld &. White, 1956) Two independent scorers assigned a category to each unit, an arbiter choosing the final score when the scorera disagreed The reliability of the four categories used was checked on one session randomlj selected from each of nine casts The two scorers agreed on 90.07% of 3,421 units (Phi coefficients for individual scoring categories have been reported m previous studies'- White et al, 1964White et al, , 1966 The frequency of each category was divided b\ thr total number of units of the patient's speech in each session. These percentage figures were then used to compute means foi groups of sessions or groups of patienti…”
Section: Scoring Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The categories included fome of those defined by Dollard and Auld (1959) and those described by White et al (1966), but only four categories are relevant to this study. S, positive sexual motivation, SA, sex anxiety, A/self, general anxiety about self and symptoms, and Other, all other units.…”
Section: Scoring Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation