2000
DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(200101)57:1<145::aid-jclp15>3.0.co;2-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A content analysis of smoking craving

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to conduct a content analysis of smoking craving in order to investigate more precisely the subjective nature of the construct with the goal of informing assessment. Thirty-two smokers interested in cessation treatment provided free response written descriptions of the level of craving they normally experience. These responses were analyzed for subjective content along five theoretical domains: physiological, affective, cognitive, behavioral, and synonyms (of craving). Although th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whilst craving is undoubtedly a complex construct (see, e.g., Shadel et al, 2001;Shiffman et al, 2004), single-item indices such as this have been found to be as sensitive and reliable as multi-item measures (West and Ussher, 2010) and have the practical benefits of simplicity and brevity.…”
Section: Clinical and Experimental Indices Assessed After 12 Hours Abmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst craving is undoubtedly a complex construct (see, e.g., Shadel et al, 2001;Shiffman et al, 2004), single-item indices such as this have been found to be as sensitive and reliable as multi-item measures (West and Ussher, 2010) and have the practical benefits of simplicity and brevity.…”
Section: Clinical and Experimental Indices Assessed After 12 Hours Abmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have identified a strong cognitive component to nicotine cravings, characterized by a thought, thought process, or an expectation of the consequences of smoking (Shadel et al 2001). Smokers are more likely to lapse after experiencing intense, persistent and distressing cravings (Shiffman et al 1997a;Shiffman et al 1996;Shiffman et al 1997b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The free listing method is an open-ended task that has smokers generate a list of adjectives and phrases related to their own craving experience. This method has been followed in previous research by Shadel, Niaura, Brown, Hutchison, and Abrams (2001), who performed content analysis of 42 smokers' descriptions of their cravings. Their list of descriptors was used in developing the instrument for this study.…”
Section: Mds Instrument Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%