2015
DOI: 10.1080/00028533.2015.11821853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Content Analysis of Arguing Behaviors: A Case Study of Romania as Compared to the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, the open-ended responses revealed that individuals commented on a post in which another friend was being attacked or sided with others in defending the OP or the target of a verbally aggressive or inappropriate comment. This goal was not as frequently reported during FtF arguments by individuals in neither Cionea et al (2017) or Cionea et al (2015) as it was in our current data. This finding may be explained by the overemphasis on flaming in online contexts.…”
Section: The Final Research Question Rq9 Asked What Opinions Peoplecontrasting
confidence: 62%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Interestingly, the open-ended responses revealed that individuals commented on a post in which another friend was being attacked or sided with others in defending the OP or the target of a verbally aggressive or inappropriate comment. This goal was not as frequently reported during FtF arguments by individuals in neither Cionea et al (2017) or Cionea et al (2015) as it was in our current data. This finding may be explained by the overemphasis on flaming in online contexts.…”
Section: The Final Research Question Rq9 Asked What Opinions Peoplecontrasting
confidence: 62%
“…Surprisingly, while most participants reported such arguments had occurred in FtF contexts, with other people, only about half anticipated seeing the person in the future. This result is somewhat different than FtF arguments, which most often occur between proximal individuals, such as friends, romantic partners, family members, and co-workers (Cionea et al, 2015). Arguments on Facebook are generally inconsequential to the arguers (although some have negative consequences) and often fizzle out rather than reaching a clear conclusion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations