2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvcir.2013.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A content-adaptive sharpness enhancement algorithm using 2D FIR filters trained by pre-emphasis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used subjective and objective aspects to evaluate the image enhancement effects. In terms of the objective metrics, six evaluation metrics were applied, namely information entropy (H) [32], mean square error (MSE) [33], peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) [34], gradient magnitude similarity deviation (GMSD) [35], mean absolute error (MAE) [36], and multi-scale structural similarity (MSSSIM) [37]. For the indicators of H, PSNR, and MSSSIM, larger values demonstrate a better enhancement of the image; for the other three metrics MSE, GMSD, and MAE, lower values demonstrate a better enhancement of the image.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We used subjective and objective aspects to evaluate the image enhancement effects. In terms of the objective metrics, six evaluation metrics were applied, namely information entropy (H) [32], mean square error (MSE) [33], peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) [34], gradient magnitude similarity deviation (GMSD) [35], mean absolute error (MAE) [36], and multi-scale structural similarity (MSSSIM) [37]. For the indicators of H, PSNR, and MSSSIM, larger values demonstrate a better enhancement of the image; for the other three metrics MSE, GMSD, and MAE, lower values demonstrate a better enhancement of the image.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where g x,y and f x,y denote the original image pixel and the enhanced image pixel, respectively [36]. If the MAE is lower, then the image quality is better.…”
Section: Objective Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%