lars, will need to be covered somewhere. Without additional large financial authorizations, these costs will likely result in resource reductions from within the VA, leading to a diminution of capabilities for the system. This would be a bad outcome and ironically may lead to less choice for veterans.The purpose of a health care system should be to match its capabilities with the clinical needs of the patients it serves. To achieve this, the VA must transition from simply being a provider of care to a network coordinator of care. Although opening the aperture to private care, the VA's proposed access standards based on nonclinical criteria will not serve veterans' interests. We should not be using arbitrary administrative rules, such as drive times and wait times (that are not based on clinical evaluations), when it comes to people's health care.The system should be based on the individual clinical needs of the veteran. Veterans and their physicians (or other licensed heath care professionals), not government policy makers, must decide when and where the most appropriate care can and should be delivered.What is needed is a clinically integrated system that uses the best of the VA and the private sector. 6 This integration can be achieved through building a system of care that offers clinically based decisions with coordinated care between the VA and private sector, transparency of outcomes, and competition based on quality and service. In addition, better predictive analytics for medical management, as well as enhanced efforts to empower veterans with better information about their own care plans, will be essential to improving the safety of the system.The VA's efforts to reform are necessary and good. Greater choice for veterans is also good. However, without the appropriate clinical safeguards, as this study by Thorpe and colleagues 2 demonstrates, unintended consequences are possible. It is essential that access standards be based on sound health policy. Our veterans deserve no less.