2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2014.02.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A contact area function for Berkovich nanoindentation: Application to hardness determination of a TiHfCN thin film

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The leading term describes a perfect pyramidal indenter which can be sometimes also considered as a free parameter; the others describe deviations from the conical geometry due to the bluntness of the indenter tip. To reduce the number of constants and to provide them a physical meaning, numerous contact area functions have been proposed based on polynomials of second degree depending on the contact depth (Chicot et al, 2014). To avoid the introduction of fitting parameters or to reduce them, Where h b can be determined by regression analysis of the experimental data or estimated from microscopic observations at very high magnifications.…”
Section: Conventional Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The leading term describes a perfect pyramidal indenter which can be sometimes also considered as a free parameter; the others describe deviations from the conical geometry due to the bluntness of the indenter tip. To reduce the number of constants and to provide them a physical meaning, numerous contact area functions have been proposed based on polynomials of second degree depending on the contact depth (Chicot et al, 2014). To avoid the introduction of fitting parameters or to reduce them, Where h b can be determined by regression analysis of the experimental data or estimated from microscopic observations at very high magnifications.…”
Section: Conventional Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the complex polynomial function proposed by Oliver and Pharr (1992) which is without any doubt the most precise function is commonly applied in nanoindentation with the continuous stiffness measurement mode. An alternative function has been proposed by Chicot et al (2014) to be relevant from 10 nm in-depth with only one fitting parameter which is the truncated tip defect length.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For all the advantages that the instrumented indentation test presents, from being a local quasi non-destructive test able to contribute in the case of complex geometries problems [25,26], to being applicable for different types of materials (treated steels [27], composite materials [8], polymers [28][29][30], glass [31,32] and coatings [33][34][35]), this test is gaining ground in many industrial applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La relation développée par Chicot et al [11] (Eq. (6)) permetégalement d'estimer l'aire de contact pour des profondeurs très faibles (<200 nm) dans le cas où la méthode CSM n'est pas disponible sur l'instrument utilisé.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified