2005
DOI: 10.1177/1059601103255772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Construct Validity Study of Commitment and Perceived Support Variables

Abstract: Social exchange theory suggests that employees feel commitment toward both their employing organizations and their work teams, while also experiencing varying levels of support from these same entities. Unfortunately, previous work has neither fully explored this possibility nor tested the capacity of currently available instruments to adequately measure the distinctiveness of the associated constructs. To address this need, we collected data from 902 employees in four diverse organizations. As predicted, resp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
74
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
74
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with the results of Bishop, Scott, Goldsby and Cropanzano (2005), employees differentiated between nested forms of commitment, specifically between contractor and client affective commitment. Our findings support the proposition that contracted employees develop attachments to both their employers and their client organizations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Consistent with the results of Bishop, Scott, Goldsby and Cropanzano (2005), employees differentiated between nested forms of commitment, specifically between contractor and client affective commitment. Our findings support the proposition that contracted employees develop attachments to both their employers and their client organizations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Employees with strong affective commitment remain because they want to, compared to those with strong continuance commitment who remain because they need to; those with strong normative commitment remain because they ought to do so (Allen & Meyer, 1990, p. 3). Of these three components of organisational commitment, affective commitment has been the most widely studied (Bishop, Scott, Goldsby & Cropanzano, 2005;Sheng & Tian, 2010;Wasti, 2003) as it has consistent relationships with performance, attendance and intention to quit (Afolabi et al, 2009;Ferreira, 2012;Hammond, 2008;Oehley, 2007). As this study focuses on the impact of servant leadership on team effectiveness, affective commitment appears to be the most appropriate component of team commitment for predictive purposes.…”
Section: Conceptualising Affective Team Commitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These indicators were designed to represent all facets/dimensions of the latent variables in each parcel in the case of multidimensional scales (e.g., supportive climate, resilience, needs satisfaction, well-being and distress; see Kishton & Widaman, 1994 for an example of this procedure). The alpha-ifdeleted method was used to distribute items in parcels in the case of one-dimensional scales (e.g., item with the highest item-total correlation was assign to the first parcel, the second highest to the second parcel, and so on; see Bishop, Scott, Goldsby, & Cropanzano, 2005 for an example of this procedure). Model fit was globally assessed using the following fit indices: the χ 2 likelihood ratio test, the Comparative Fit Index (CFI), the Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI), the Standardized Root Mean Square Residual (SRMR) and the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA).…”
Section: Analytical Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%