2016
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637x/831/2/116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Constraint on the Formation Timescale of the Young Open Cluster NGC 2264: Lithium Abundance of Pre-Main Sequence Stars

Abstract: The timescale of cluster formation is an essential parameter in order to understand the formation process of star clusters. Pre-main sequence (PMS) stars in nearby young open clusters reveal a large spread in brightness. If the spread were considered to be a result of a real spread in age, the corresponding cluster formation timescale would be about 5-20 Myr. Hence it could be interpreted that star formation in an open cluster is prolonged for up to a few tens of Myr. However, difficulties in reddening correct… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numbers (median ages) reported in Table 2 suggest that a spread of 4-5 Myr exists among cluster members (see also Getman et al 2014). This is compatible with the age spread estimated by Lim et al (2016) from the Li abundances of NGC 2264 PMS objects (although Bouvier et al 2016 examined the dispersion of EW(Li) for K4-M0 WTTS in NGC 2264 from GESiDR4 data and concluded that this scatter is likely not caused by an age spread).…”
Section: Regionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The numbers (median ages) reported in Table 2 suggest that a spread of 4-5 Myr exists among cluster members (see also Getman et al 2014). This is compatible with the age spread estimated by Lim et al (2016) from the Li abundances of NGC 2264 PMS objects (although Bouvier et al 2016 examined the dispersion of EW(Li) for K4-M0 WTTS in NGC 2264 from GESiDR4 data and concluded that this scatter is likely not caused by an age spread).…”
Section: Regionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The mean age and age spread of Stock 8 is 6.5 ± 0.2 dex or 3.16 (+1.85 -1.16) Myr. The contribution from the true age spread due to star formation history of the cluster is comparable to other star forming regions such as W3-main (2-3 Myr;Bik et al 2012) andNGC2264 (3-4 Myr;Lim et al 2016). The luminosity spread corresponding to the 1σ observed age spread at V − I= 2.5 mag is 0.24 dex.…”
Section: Probable Causes Of the Apparent Age Spreadsupporting
confidence: 49%
“…KH 15D is a pre-main sequence (PMS) spectroscopic binary (A+B) with near-equal-mass components (0.715M ⊙ for Star A and 0.74M ⊙ for Star B), high eccentricity (e ≈ 0.6), a semi-major axis of ∼0.25 au, and a period of 48.37 days Winn et al 2006;Aronow et al 2018). It is a member of the NGC 2264 cluster which is at ∼ 750 pc, based on the members from Venuti et al 2018 and Gaia Data Release 2 parallaxes, and the cluster is about ∼2-6 Myr old (Naylor 2009;Lim et al 2016). KH 15D exhibits unique and dramatic long and short term photometric variability (e.g., Capelo et al 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%