2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.112882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A constrained multi-swarm particle swarm optimization without velocity for constrained optimization problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kennedy and Eberhart first implemented the PSO algorithm and is still commonly used because of their common and effective approach to non-linear optimization [52], [53]. Rather than using evolutionary operators to control the individuals, as in other evolutionary computational algorithms, each individual in PSO flies in the search space with a velocity that is modified dynamically depending on the best position of the particle (pbest) and the companion's best position (gbest).…”
Section: B Particle Swarm Optimization (Pso)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kennedy and Eberhart first implemented the PSO algorithm and is still commonly used because of their common and effective approach to non-linear optimization [52], [53]. Rather than using evolutionary operators to control the individuals, as in other evolutionary computational algorithms, each individual in PSO flies in the search space with a velocity that is modified dynamically depending on the best position of the particle (pbest) and the companion's best position (gbest).…”
Section: B Particle Swarm Optimization (Pso)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 7 gives the mean and standard deviation of objective values with respect to CETDE and nine competing algorithms. Among all nine competitors, the first four are DEbased methods (i.e., DPDE [31], rank-iMDDE [36], eDE [44], and FRC-CEA [28]), the next four are non-DE-based methods (i.e., AIS [45], CMPSOWV [46], I-ABC [47] and ITLBO [48]), and the last one is a PSO-and DE-based hybrid method (i.e., DPD [49]). Since the best feasible optimal values are known, we compare the mean function values with the best known optima.…”
Section: B General Performance Of Cetde On Ieee Cec2006 Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its simple updating formulas and excellent searching ability, PSO has been widely applied in clustering analysis [17] and other optimization fields, e.g., single-and multi-objective problems [18], artificial neural network improving problem [19], assignment problem [20], and optimum battery energy storage problem [21]. However, the canonical PSO still must be improved with respect to parameter setting [22]- [24], updating strategy [25]- [28], and convergence theory [29]- [31], among others. Particularly, Wen et al [32] introduced Gauss distribution function into PSO, and the obtained Gaussian-PSO had excellent optimization performance, which was also verified by Higashi and Iba [33] later.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%