2019
DOI: 10.3390/s19102252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Constrained Coding-Aware Routing Scheme in Wireless Ad-Hoc Networks

Abstract: In wireless multi-hop networks, instead of using the traditional store-and-forward method, the relay nodes can exploit the network coding idea to encode and transmit the packets in the distributed coding-aware routing (DCAR) mechanisms, which can decrease the transmission number and achieve higher throughput. However, depending on the primary coding conditions of DCAR, the DCAR-type schemes may not only detect more coding opportunities, but also lead to an imbalanced distribution of the network load. Especiall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 43 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The verification method can determine whether a link can carry out data transmission. In wireless networks, it is often possible to provide validation at no cost [23]. If a retransmission of a confirmation request has reached the maximum allowable number of retransmissions and no response is received, the sending node considers that the link to the next hop has been broken, removes the link from its routing memory, and returns to the source node with a routing error [24].…”
Section: Routing Maintenance Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The verification method can determine whether a link can carry out data transmission. In wireless networks, it is often possible to provide validation at no cost [23]. If a retransmission of a confirmation request has reached the maximum allowable number of retransmissions and no response is received, the sending node considers that the link to the next hop has been broken, removes the link from its routing memory, and returns to the source node with a routing error [24].…”
Section: Routing Maintenance Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%