2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2016.08.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A constrained assumed modes method for solution of a new dynamic equation for an axially moving beam

Abstract: a b s t r a c tFlexible beams with prismatic joints have complicated differential equations. This complexity is mostly due to axial motion of the beam. In the present research, a horizontal flexible link sliding through a passive prismatic joint while attached to a rigid link of a robot moving in a vertical direction is considered. A body coordinate system is used which aids in obtaining a new and rather simple form of the differential equation without the loss of generality. To model the passive prismatic joi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the constrained modal test, the free modal test is easier to realize without the coupling interference of other key components. Compared with the results of free modal analysis, the vibration characteristics obtained from the free modal test can verify the accuracy of the threshing cylinder model, and then the constraint modal analysis can be applied to the threshing cylinder according to the actual working state to replace the constraint modal test to avoid the dynamic coupling between the working parts, so that the vibration characteristics obtained from the solution are more accurate and reliable [34].…”
Section: Free Modal Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the constrained modal test, the free modal test is easier to realize without the coupling interference of other key components. Compared with the results of free modal analysis, the vibration characteristics obtained from the free modal test can verify the accuracy of the threshing cylinder model, and then the constraint modal analysis can be applied to the threshing cylinder according to the actual working state to replace the constraint modal test to avoid the dynamic coupling between the working parts, so that the vibration characteristics obtained from the solution are more accurate and reliable [34].…”
Section: Free Modal Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beside the two most popular methods of GEF and ANCF, new researches with new ideas are also performed for different problems of beam large deflection; see [33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Analytical methods such as assumed modes method [40][41][42][43][44] can also be developed or combined with the finite element method for use in the large deflection of the beam structures.…”
Section: And Mahdi Sharifniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two main computational methods are used in flexible multibody dynamics: assumed mode method (AMM) and finite element method (FEM). The AMM can still be extended for use in more complicated systems (Sharifnia and Akbarzadeh, 2014, 2016a, 2016b, 2016c, 2017). Some researchers compared the results of the AMM with experimental results (Ettefagh et al, 2018; Korayem et al, 2014, 2016; Luo, 1993; Nagaraj et al, 1997; Yim et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%