A Constitutive Model Fitting Methodology for Ductile Metals Using Cold Upsetting Tests and Numeric Optimization Techniques

Abstract

This work documents the development of a tool to perform automated parameter fitting of constitutive material models. Specific to this work is the fitting of a Swift hardening rule and isotropic linear plasticity model to aluminum 2024-T351, C36000 brass, and C10100 copper. Material characterization was conducted through the use of compressive, cold upsetting tests. A noncontact, optical displacement measurement system was applied to measure the axial and radial deformation of the test specimens. Nonlinear optimization techniques were then applied to tune a finite element model to match experimental results through the optimization of material model parameters as well as frictional coefficient. The result is a system, which can determine constitutive model parameters rapidly and without user interaction. While this tool provided material parameters for each material and model tested, the quality of the fit varied depending on how appropriate the constitutive model was to the material's actual plastic behavior. Aluminum's behavior proved to be an excellent match to the Swift hardening rule while the behavior of brass and copper was described better by the linear plasticity model.

Flow Behaviour in Compression Test Under Various Lubrication Conditions

“…Another possibility of obtaining the flow curve are the punching techniques resulting in equi-biaxial stress state, such as a bulge test (Dick and Yoon, 2018) or small punch test (Šebek et al, 2018). Finally, the flow behaviour can be based on the upsetting test (Hartlen and Doman, 2018). The punching as well as compression testing is complicated by the friction on the contrary to the tensile experiments.…”