2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.adt.2004.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A consistent set of nuclear rms charge radii: properties of the radius surface R(N,Z)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

29
293
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 682 publications
(329 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
29
293
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The rms radius of the 28 Si density obtained from the analysis of the fusion data is shown in Table III. It is seen to be in very good agreement with the rms radius of the point-proton distribution that has been extracted from the measured rms charge radius [21].…”
Section: Densitiessupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The rms radius of the 28 Si density obtained from the analysis of the fusion data is shown in Table III. It is seen to be in very good agreement with the rms radius of the point-proton distribution that has been extracted from the measured rms charge radius [21].…”
Section: Densitiessupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Notwithstanding the preceding, when comparing with the experimental binding energies [22] of 661.6 MeV for 76 Ge and 662.07 MeV for 76 Se we get a 0.5% underestimation in the calculation with the usual Sk3 force and a 2% overestimation in the calculation with the Sk3 ν force. Concerning the charge radii, the HF(Sk3) + BCS results are 4.12 fm for 76 Ge and 4.17 fm for 76 Se, whereas with increased spin-orbit strength one gets 4.09 fm for 76 Ge and 4.14 fm for 76 Se, which actually agree better with the experimental values of 4.08 fm for 76 Ge and of 4.14 fm for 76 Se [11].…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…The β values extracted from data in Refs. [10,11] are β = 0.13 for 74 Ge and β = 0.12 for 78 Se. The inclusion of experimental deformation and a larger spin-orbit strength for neutrons change also in this case the theoretical results toward a better agreement with the experimental data.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This positive value is in line with the result δ r 2 35,37 = +0.127 fm 2 that can be calculated from the rms of Angeli's compilation [42] that have been determined by averaging the charge radii extracted from different sources [43]. In view of the large dispersion of the nuclear data, we think that it is preferable to use the same reference for both isotopes to maintain some coherence.…”
Section: Isotope Field Shiftsupporting
confidence: 61%