2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jeconom.2011.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A consistent nonparametric test for nonlinear causality—Specification in time series regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
296
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 260 publications
(320 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
296
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We present here a novel methodology, as proposed by Balcilar et al, (forthcoming), for the detection on nonlinear causality via a hybrid approach based on the frameworks of Nishiyama et al, (2011) andJeong et al, (2012). We denote dollar-based exchange rate returns as (y t ) and the differential between own-country EPU and the U.S. EPU as (x t ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We present here a novel methodology, as proposed by Balcilar et al, (forthcoming), for the detection on nonlinear causality via a hybrid approach based on the frameworks of Nishiyama et al, (2011) andJeong et al, (2012). We denote dollar-based exchange rate returns as (y t ) and the differential between own-country EPU and the U.S. EPU as (x t ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it can be shown that it is impossible to combine the different statistics for each 1,2, … , into one statistic for the joint null in Eq. (14) because the statistics are mutually correlated (Nishiyama et al, 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Against this backdrop, the objective of our paper is to compare the predictive ability of cay and cay MS not only for real stock returns, but also their volatility, using the nonparametric causality test of Nishiyama et al (2011). This test is developed to study higher order causality and is inherently based on a nonlinear dependence structure between the variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%