2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.07.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Conserved Zinc Binding Domain in the Largest Subunit of DNA-dependent RNA Polymerase Modulates Intrinsic Transcription Termination and Antitermination but does not Stabilize the Elongation Complex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S8). This corresponds to the previously reported effects of β′ ZBD mutations on intrinsic termination by E. coli RNAP (20). At the same time, p7 suppressed termination by the mutant RNAP to almost the same level as in the case of the control reconstituted wild-type X. oryzae RNAP.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…S8). This corresponds to the previously reported effects of β′ ZBD mutations on intrinsic termination by E. coli RNAP (20). At the same time, p7 suppressed termination by the mutant RNAP to almost the same level as in the case of the control reconstituted wild-type X. oryzae RNAP.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…1A and Table S2): (i) the β′ coiled-coil/β gate loop, targeted by RfaH and its paralogs (15); (ii) the β flap/RNA exit channel, targeted by N, Q and gp39 (4, 7, 9-11); and (iii) the β′ N terminus and adjacent regions, involved in antitermination by p7. In addition, p7 seems to partially share its target site with an RNA-based antiterminator, the put hairpin encoded by phage HK022, the function of which was shown to depend on the β′ ZBD (20,43,44). Despite the different binding sites, all classes of factors suppress transcription pausing by bacterial RNAP, which therefore is likely a universal part of all antitermination mechanisms (Table S2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One arm of each put RNA binds directly to RNAP throughout elongation; put -modified enzymes transcribe at faster rates than enzymes that are not bound by put RNAs and read through terminators located thousands of base pairs downstream 86 . The activity of the put transcripts can be reconstituted in vitro in the absence of accessory factors and is thought to be mediated by a direct interaction with the β′-zinc-finger 87 . The put RNAs inhibit RNAP backtracking near the site of recruitment by blocking the re-entry of the transcript into the RNA exit channel 88 , but the mechanism of long-range antitermination modification and the involvement of any cellular proteins remain unknown.…”
Section: Bypassing Multiple Consecutive Terminatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Zn-binding element is in close proximity to the RNA exit channel; p7 may thus influence transcription termination by altering the Zn-binding element interactions with RNA. In this scenario, the p7 mechanism of action would be similar to transcription antitermination by the phage HK022 put element, which acts by affecting the Zn-binding element interactions with the transcript (17). The β′-zipper is located at the upstream edge of transcription bubble, where the non-template DNA strand controls transcription termination efficiency by displacing the RNA from the RNA-DNA hybrid (18).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%