2011
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m111.253435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Conserved Non-canonical Motif in the Pseudoactive Site of the ROP5 Pseudokinase Domain Mediates Its Effect on Toxoplasma Virulence

Abstract: The ROP5 family is a closely related set of polymorphic pseudokinases that are critical to the ability of Toxoplasma to cause disease. Polymorphisms in ROP5 also make it a major determinant of strain-specific differences in virulence. ROP5 possesses all of the major kinase motifs required for catalysis except for a substitution at the catalytic Asp. We show that this substitution in the catalytic loop of ROP5 is part of a motif conserved in other pseudokinases of both Toxoplasma and human origin, and that this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
86
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(58 reference statements)
2
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In many cases, it appears that the inability of many pseudokinases to catalyse a phosphotransfer reaction is likely to be a moot point with respect to their cellular functions. The detailed characterization of pseudokinases, including STRADα (STE20-related adaptor α) [28,29] and ROP5B I (rhoptry protein kinase 5B I ) [30], illustrates that ATP binding is likely to serve an important role in governing protein conformation and that this, rather than any vestigial catalytic activity, underlies in vivo function. In other cases, as vividly illustrated by studies of ILK (integrin-linked kinase) [19,31,32], ATP binding does not modulate protein conformation, suggesting that an ATP-binding conformation, rather than ATP binding itself, is crucial to the scaffolding function of some pseudokinases.…”
Section: To Be or Not To Be (Active) That Is The Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many cases, it appears that the inability of many pseudokinases to catalyse a phosphotransfer reaction is likely to be a moot point with respect to their cellular functions. The detailed characterization of pseudokinases, including STRADα (STE20-related adaptor α) [28,29] and ROP5B I (rhoptry protein kinase 5B I ) [30], illustrates that ATP binding is likely to serve an important role in governing protein conformation and that this, rather than any vestigial catalytic activity, underlies in vivo function. In other cases, as vividly illustrated by studies of ILK (integrin-linked kinase) [19,31,32], ATP binding does not modulate protein conformation, suggesting that an ATP-binding conformation, rather than ATP binding itself, is crucial to the scaffolding function of some pseudokinases.…”
Section: To Be or Not To Be (Active) That Is The Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…duplication of genes in tandem arrays such that their apparent copy number varies (greater than 1) when compared to the genome as a whole Positive selection: divergence from the expected random ratio of mutations such that nonsynonymous changes occur at an elevated frequency relative to expected values a kinase domain and binds ATP, it adopts an altered conformation and is not known to catalyze phosphate transfer (96).…”
Section: Copy Number Variation (Cnv)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not apparent for an IRG‐specific function of ROP5 in our own experiments (Fleckenstein et al ., 2012), an interaction of ROP5 with ROP18 was reported to control T. gondii virulence by up‐regulation of ROP18 activity (Behnke et al ., 2012). The rop5 locus is represented by a cluster of tandemly repeated genes encoding three different ROP5 isoforms, ROP5A, ROP5B and ROP5C, each containing multiple copies, and all isoforms are predicted to be catalytically inactive (El Hajj et al ., 2006; Reese and Boothroyd, 2011). Individual sequences of these rop5 paralogues are almost identical within strains but differ considerably between T. gondii types I, II and III strains (Behnke et al ., 2011; Reese et al ., 2011; Niedelman et al ., 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%