2018
DOI: 10.15252/msb.20188516
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A conserved mechanism drives partition complex assembly on bacterial chromosomes and plasmids

Abstract: Chromosome and plasmid segregation in bacteria are mostly driven by ParABS systems. These DNA partitioning machineries rely on large nucleoprotein complexes assembled on centromere sites (parS). However, the mechanism of how a few parS‐bound ParB proteins nucleate the formation of highly concentrated ParB clusters remains unclear despite several proposed physico‐mathematical models. We discriminated between these different models by varying some key parameters in vivo using the F plasmid partition system. We f… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

8
119
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
8
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our novel approach allowed us to visualize the dynamic nature of the ParB binding with evidence for fast and continuous exchange of proteins with the surrounding media. This dynamic behavior is consistent with results described not only for BsParB (Graham et al, 2014) (Taylor et al, 2015) (Song et al, 2017) (Fisher et al, 2017), but also for E. coli ParB (Sanchez et al, 2015) (Le Gall et al, 2016), plasmid ParB (Debaugny et al, 2018), and for other proteins, at the single molecule level (Gibb et al, 2014). Implementation of a multilaminar flow exchange system to the combined MT-TIRF setup provided a measurement of binding and unbinding reactions in the presence of the free CTD leading to the conclusion that it only affects binding and unbinding of ParB in a buffer supplemented with EDTA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our novel approach allowed us to visualize the dynamic nature of the ParB binding with evidence for fast and continuous exchange of proteins with the surrounding media. This dynamic behavior is consistent with results described not only for BsParB (Graham et al, 2014) (Taylor et al, 2015) (Song et al, 2017) (Fisher et al, 2017), but also for E. coli ParB (Sanchez et al, 2015) (Le Gall et al, 2016), plasmid ParB (Debaugny et al, 2018), and for other proteins, at the single molecule level (Gibb et al, 2014). Implementation of a multilaminar flow exchange system to the combined MT-TIRF setup provided a measurement of binding and unbinding reactions in the presence of the free CTD leading to the conclusion that it only affects binding and unbinding of ParB in a buffer supplemented with EDTA.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Analysis of ParB complexes using 2D PALM reveals ParB-dense regions within clusters that correlate to the number of ParB enrichment zones along adjacent parS sites. In line with a current study on ParB cluster-assembly in V. cholerae 61 , we suggest that these subclusters derive from independent nucleation and caging events, which merge into one ParB-macrocomplex per oriC in C. glutamicum . Presence of a single parS site leads to formation of almost globular ParB densities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The centromere parS is the first DNA locus to be segregated following chromosome replication 8,9,14,15 . ParB specifically nucleates on parS before spreading outwards to the flanking DNA and bridges/cages DNA together to form a nucleoprotein network in vivo [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] . This nucleoprotein complex recruits SMC to disentangle and organize replicated DNA 3,11,13,24,25 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%