2003
DOI: 10.1021/ci0202741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Consensus Neural Network-Based Technique for Discriminating Soluble and Poorly Soluble Compounds

Abstract: BCUT [Burden, CAS, and University of Texas] descriptors, defined as eigenvalues of modified connectivity matrices, have traditionally been applied to drug design tasks such as defining receptor relevant subspaces to assist in compound selections. In this paper we present studies of consensus neural networks trained on BCUTs to discriminate compounds with poor aqueous solubility from those with reasonable solubility. This level was set at 0.1 mg/mL on advice from drug formulation and drug discovery scientists. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[32] 4) Consensus modeling using ANNs have been published by Manallack and co-workers. [33] They used BCUT variables with diagonal elements consisting of charges, hydrogen bonding acceptor and donor ability, and polarizability.…”
Section: In Silico Solubility Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32] 4) Consensus modeling using ANNs have been published by Manallack and co-workers. [33] They used BCUT variables with diagonal elements consisting of charges, hydrogen bonding acceptor and donor ability, and polarizability.…”
Section: In Silico Solubility Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few in silico models for classification of solubility have been published, e.g., by Stahura et al [38] and Manallack et al [39]. In the present study the solubility of the compounds were determined in a turbidimetric assay at the following concentrations 0.001, 0.005, 0.01, 0.02, 0.04, 0.08, or 0.1 mg/mL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Particularly for classification models, a quantitative value of prediction can be used to estimate the accuracy of prediction: the nearer this value is to the closest classification label {þ1; À1}, the more reliable given prediction is supposed to be, as it was investigated in study by Manallack et al [18]. Indeed, values that are close to zero are in ''uncertainty area'' and may signal that prediction is not confident.…”
Section: Generalization For Classification Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%