A confirmatory factor analytic evaluation of the Klein Sexual Orientation Grid.

Abstract

The Klein Sexual Orientation Grid (KSOG) is a commonly used framework in research and public education despite limited psychometric evaluation to date. Previous literature argues for theory-or Principal Components Analysis (PCA)-driven KSOG models based on time (i.e., past, present, and future self-concept) across 7 dimensions, or nuanced factor structures combining time with general sexual orientation subscales. Using a sample of 277 self-identified lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) community members in a low socioeconomic stats (SES) urban district, the present study exposed these KSOG models, as well as 2 single-factor total scores, to confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). We further tested evidence of disparities in past, present and future (ideal) scores, as well as the possibility of a unique factor structure in the present sample. Results showed the following: (a) significant, yet modestly sized, differences in past scores from present and ideal scores; (b) inadequate statistical fit of all previous KSOG factor structures; and (c) a complex and unique 3-factor structure in the present sample which also failed to display adequate fit after exposure to CFA modeling. Implications are discussed emphasizing KSOG refinement and careful consideration when using the KSOG in research, education, and practice. We also offer future research directions for additional KSOG development.

The New Genetic Evidence on Same-Gender Sexuality: Implications for Sexual Fluidity and Multiple Forms of Sexual Diversity

“…This phenomenon has been described as "non-specificity" (Chivers & Bailey, 2005), but obviously overlaps with the construct of sexual fluidity: How exactly do these constructs differ? Evidence also shows that some individuals engage in periodic sexual behavior that diverges from their self-described sexual orientation or identity (Cramer et al, 2015;Matthews et al, 2014;Ward, 2015). Does this provide evidence for sexual fluidity, or is it simply attributable to bisexuality?…”