2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2011.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A confidence interval test for the detection of structural breaks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Atypical observations, level shifts or variance change are common features of many real-life data sets [7,20,21]. Neglecting such effects may lead to inaccurate estimation of parameters of the model and in consequence inaccurate or a completely wrong prediction.…”
Section: Statistical Tests For Stationaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Atypical observations, level shifts or variance change are common features of many real-life data sets [7,20,21]. Neglecting such effects may lead to inaccurate estimation of parameters of the model and in consequence inaccurate or a completely wrong prediction.…”
Section: Statistical Tests For Stationaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the distribution is fitted to the residual series that is assumed to be i.i.d. But many independent variables seem to display changes in the underlying data generating process over time [7], therefore, they cannot be considered as an identically distributed sample. This typical behavior is also observed in time series described in Sec.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mentioned above types of nonstationarity can be successfully tested and recognized from the data but they are not the only problems one may encounters during data analysis. Atypical observations, level shifts or variance change are common features of many real-life data sets [10,5,17]. Neglecting such effects may lead to inaccurate estimation of parameters of the model and in consequence inaccurate or completely wrong prediction.…”
Section: Statistical Tests For Stationaritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case the distribution is fitted to the residual series that is assumed to be i.i.d. But many independent variables seem to display changes in the underlying data generating process over time [10] therefore they can not be considered as identically distributed sample. This typical behavior we observe also in time series described in Section 2 that presents increments of floating potential fluctuations of turbulent laboratory plasma for the small torus radial position r = 37 cm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The debate as to how to proceed with all the techniques and their costs and benefits is a long one. The interested reader is referred toPerron and Vogelsang (1992), Papell (1997), Ben-David, Lumsdaine, andPapell (2003),Enders (2004),Shrestha and Chowdhury (2005),Glynn, Nelson and Reetu (2007) for a quick, but non-exhaustive review.5 We also conduct theGenc and Arzaghi (2011) test to specifically detect any structural break in the slope of the remittance data. We find no such break, which confirms our findings below.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%