1994
DOI: 10.1109/42.276157
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A cone-beam reconstruction algorithm using shift-variant filtering and cone-beam backprojection

Abstract: An exact inversion formula written in the form of shift-variant filtered-backprojection (FBP) is given for reconstruction from cone-beam data taken from any orbit satisfying H.K. Tuy's (1983) sufficiency conditions. The method is based on a result of P. Grangeat (1987), involving the derivative of the three-dimensional (3D) Radon transform, but unlike Grangeat's algorithm, no 3D rebinning step is required. Data redundancy, which occurs when several cone-beam projections supply the same values in the Radon doma… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
160
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 177 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
160
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Several modified trajectories, such as circle-plus-arc, circle-plus-line, dualcircle, or saddle trajectories ( Fig. 6; [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]) try to resolve the first problem listed above (missing frequency data). In , a phantom known to demonstrate such a problem is shown for just a single-circle trajectory on the left and a dual-circle trajectory on the right.…”
Section: Cone-beam Step-and-shoot Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several modified trajectories, such as circle-plus-arc, circle-plus-line, dualcircle, or saddle trajectories ( Fig. 6; [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]) try to resolve the first problem listed above (missing frequency data). In , a phantom known to demonstrate such a problem is shown for just a single-circle trajectory on the left and a dual-circle trajectory on the right.…”
Section: Cone-beam Step-and-shoot Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, a single partial-circle (or even full circle) scan in the cone-beam geometry provides inherently incomplete data for reconstructing sections off the midplane of the acquired volume, leading to streaking and shading that increases in severity as the plane of interest moves away from the midplane of the acquisition. [33][34][35][36][37] Note, however, that the brain of the swine is relatively small in the z-direction, so evidence of cone-beam artifact was not seen in this study.…”
Section: Creating Realistic Ich In a Swine: Presence Of Iodinated Conmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can produce pre-operative 3D images for planning but also interventionnal 3D images for controling. Since the beginning of 1980s, 3D reconstruction techniques from conical x-ray projections have been greatly improved [7,11,5,14]. Reconstructions of high contrast structures from few projections acquired on image intensifiers have been proposed [15,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%