2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.12.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A concise model for evaluating water electrolysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As for point b), the perforated electrode can offer a standardized geometry for in depth studies on the effect of multiphase ion and charge transfer typical of PEM or alkali electrolyzers electrodes. As in the present study, the complex nature of the phenomena occurring at the electrodes is often lumped into a single interface resistance of the electrode [54][55][56]. Recent modeling and experimental approaches (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for point b), the perforated electrode can offer a standardized geometry for in depth studies on the effect of multiphase ion and charge transfer typical of PEM or alkali electrolyzers electrodes. As in the present study, the complex nature of the phenomena occurring at the electrodes is often lumped into a single interface resistance of the electrode [54][55][56]. Recent modeling and experimental approaches (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though well-established simulations [9,10,22,13,12,23] are available in the literature, there is a limited number of system modeling related to PEM electrolysis in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PEM electrolyzers have been studied and modeled by several authors to date, using similar physical relationships each time with slight modifications (Abdin et al, 2015;Agbli et al, 2011;Awasthi et al, 2011;García-Valverde et al, 2012;Han et al, 2015;Lee et al, 2013;Martinson et al, 2014;Rozain and Millet, 2012;Shen et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2012). (Olivier et al, 2017) performed a thorough study of all published research to date and compared physical expressions used in various papers.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%