A conceptual systemic framework proposal for sustainable technology development: incorporating future studies within a co-evolutionary approach

Abstract

This article explores the role of future studies in developing sustainable technologies within a coevolutionary context. In the first section, it clarifies briefly the definition of sustainable development, complexity and co-evolution, in order to establish the frame within which the theoretical exploration will be carried out. The second section provides information about characteristics of sustainable technology development, which requires a radical shift from the current technological paradigm. Other types of innovations in institutional, social and organisational domains, which co-exist with or precede technological innovations, and influence of these on sustainable technology development, are clarified also in this section. The third section reveals the relationship between technology development and future studies. This relationship is projected onto sustainable technology development and the need for radical innovations. Foresighting-backcasting approach is presented as a meta-tool to facilitate the co-evolutionary innovation by allowing a non-reductionist systems approach possible towards development of sustainable technologies. It is concluded that, within the co-evolutionary innovation framework, planning for governance and policy development should have the longest time span and largest operational context in order to link all types of innovations to each other and render radical technological change possible.

A conceptual framework for energy technology sustainability assessment

“…Despite the debates and arguments around the concept of sustainable development, the conceptual priority is mainly sustaining the society and not explicitly the environment and the economy (Gaziulusoy et al, 2008). However, the irreversible hierarchical interdependencies depicted in Fig.…”

A Systems Analysis of Factors Influencing Household Solar PV Adoption in Santiago, Chile

“…Such interdependencies make it difficult to assess any single factor's influence on the diffusion of renewables [5,18,19]. As a result, the transition to renewables has been defined as a complex system, [20][21][22]. The electricity system itself has been defined as a system of systems where electricity generation, distribution and consumption are composed of multiple, interdependent elements impacting the rate of renewable technology uptake [23].…”

A journey to KAOS: tackling “wicked” infrastructure

“…Some of the implementation issues being experienced at the practical or applied level appear to stem from a dichotomy that arises from the inherently systemic nature of sustainability [13,14] and the reductionist or project oriented nature of business and engineering [15,16]. This is perhaps underscored (at least in the New Zealand context) by the RMA and the legislative focus in the consenting of capital works and can be seen in infrastructure within (for example) strategic documents and sustainability statements.…”