2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A conceptual model of volume-change controls on the hydrology of cutover peats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
108
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
108
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be a result of question around the suitability of levelling measurements made along transects at 42 × 20 m resolution to compare against a pixel size of approximately 100 m × 100 m. Any further validation campaign should adopt calibration and validation methods designed for measuring contiguous mapping (i.e., be randomly located) and consider intra-pixel deployment of levelling measurements. That said, however, peatland is predominantly water (typically about 95% in volume) and surface motion both short and long term is predominantly driven by changes in the mass of water within the peat body (e.g., [60]). Hydraulic continuity operates on scales of much greater than 100 m, the scale of mire units (mesotopes) and mire complexes (macrotopes) [61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be a result of question around the suitability of levelling measurements made along transects at 42 × 20 m resolution to compare against a pixel size of approximately 100 m × 100 m. Any further validation campaign should adopt calibration and validation methods designed for measuring contiguous mapping (i.e., be randomly located) and consider intra-pixel deployment of levelling measurements. That said, however, peatland is predominantly water (typically about 95% in volume) and surface motion both short and long term is predominantly driven by changes in the mass of water within the peat body (e.g., [60]). Hydraulic continuity operates on scales of much greater than 100 m, the scale of mire units (mesotopes) and mire complexes (macrotopes) [61].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Total porosity is:  T = 1-[(W 2 / t )/V] where  t is the peat density (here 2.2 according to Kennedy and Price, 2005).…”
Section: Field and Laboratory Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ss term is defined as the amount of water that is expelled from aquifer storage due to compressibility of the soil matrix per unit change in head (Kennedy and Price, 2005), and is calculated as:…”
Section: Field and Laboratory Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher compressibility peat that can maintain saturation can attenuate variations in pore-water concentration of contaminants (Mouniemne and Price, 2007). The compressibility of peat diminishes with time, although expansion of pores by seasonal frost in the upper layer provides a significant degree of recovery (Kennedy and Price, 2005). Furthermore, re-activation of this property is important in restoring peatlands (Shantz and Price, 2006a).…”
Section: Groundwater and Peat Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%