1989
DOI: 10.2307/3587333
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Conceptual Framework for the Integration of Language and Content in Second/Foreign Language Instruction

Abstract: This article proposes a conceptual framework for the integration of language and content teaching in second and foreign language classrooms. In this model, language and content teachers work collaboratively to determine language-teaching objectives. These objectives derive from two considerations: (a) content-obligatory language (language essential to an understanding of content material) and (b) content-compatible language (language that can be taught naturally within the context of a particular subject matte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
123
1
5

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 254 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(3 reference statements)
0
123
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The need for a clear and explicit focus on grammatical forms within a meaningoriented approach in order to promote accurate use of the L2 has been identified as a key area for language immersion education (Doughty 2003;Lyster and Mori 2008;Met 2008;Snow, Met and Genesee 1989), including CLIL (Content-Language Integrated Learning), ( Coyle, Hood and Marsh 2010;de Graaff et al 2007;Mearns 2012). It has been often acknowledged that while comprehension skills and fluency on the part of the learners are often highly developed in many language immersion contexts because of the exposure to high levels of meaningful content and enhanced opportunities for communicative interaction, achieving high levels of grammatical accuracy in the target language is not always as successfully realised (Fortune,Tedick and Walker 2008;Nassaji and Fotos 2011;Robinson 2003;Swain 1998).…”
Section: 'Noticing' and Focus-on-form In Immersion Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The need for a clear and explicit focus on grammatical forms within a meaningoriented approach in order to promote accurate use of the L2 has been identified as a key area for language immersion education (Doughty 2003;Lyster and Mori 2008;Met 2008;Snow, Met and Genesee 1989), including CLIL (Content-Language Integrated Learning), ( Coyle, Hood and Marsh 2010;de Graaff et al 2007;Mearns 2012). It has been often acknowledged that while comprehension skills and fluency on the part of the learners are often highly developed in many language immersion contexts because of the exposure to high levels of meaningful content and enhanced opportunities for communicative interaction, achieving high levels of grammatical accuracy in the target language is not always as successfully realised (Fortune,Tedick and Walker 2008;Nassaji and Fotos 2011;Robinson 2003;Swain 1998).…”
Section: 'Noticing' and Focus-on-form In Immersion Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Content knowledge and skills cannot be separated from the linguistic means, through which that knowledge and skill is manifest. Approaches to content-based language instruction (Chamot & O'Malley, 1987;Snow, Met & Genesee, 1989) can be enriched through an understanding of "content," especially at university level. Consequently, as the difficulty of the concepts increases, we want the students' learning of the language that construes those concepts to also become more complex.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from these, content based instruction need of ELLs is also underlined by the views of the experts in the study. When ELLs aware of the fact that they are able to use the foreign language in their academic study or professional work, they become more interested and motivated (Snow et al, 1992). Hence, it is understood that content relevant to students' academic or professional needs help ELLs to facilitate their acquisition of language and content knowledge together.…”
Section: Volume 5 Issue 3 September 2017mentioning
confidence: 99%