2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvlc.2011.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A conceptual framework and taxonomy of techniques for analyzing movement

Abstract: This is the unspecified version of the paper.This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link AbstractMovement data link together space, time, and objects positioned in space and time. They hold valuable and multifaceted information about moving objects, properties of space and time as well as events and processes occurring in space and time. We present a conceptual framework that describes in a systematic and comprehensive way the possible types of inform… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
81
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the flocking patterns that are visualised in Figure 5 were determined interactively, and they were found to be representative for the data set and consistent with the findings that indicate that the average size of tropical cyclones varies between 330 and 660 km (Chavas and Emanuel 2010). The most common way to visualise the clustering results is by colouring the display elements representing the clustered items according to their cluster membership and involving graphical summarisation of clusters, such as generation of convex hulls (Andrienko et al 2011). We have used both the approaches for the task of flock verification; flocks are shown as cylinders where the size is proportional to the value of " parameter.…”
Section: Embedding the Algorithm Into A Visual Environmentsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, the flocking patterns that are visualised in Figure 5 were determined interactively, and they were found to be representative for the data set and consistent with the findings that indicate that the average size of tropical cyclones varies between 330 and 660 km (Chavas and Emanuel 2010). The most common way to visualise the clustering results is by colouring the display elements representing the clustered items according to their cluster membership and involving graphical summarisation of clusters, such as generation of convex hulls (Andrienko et al 2011). We have used both the approaches for the task of flock verification; flocks are shown as cylinders where the size is proportional to the value of " parameter.…”
Section: Embedding the Algorithm Into A Visual Environmentsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In order to verify those flocks, the visual interface should also be able to deal with the visualisation of these large data sets. Andrienko et al (2011) offer comprehensive review of the most common ways to visualise the trajectory data and spatio-temporal events. The established visualisation techniques are animated map and Space-Time Cube (STC) (Andrienko et al 2011).…”
Section: Embedding the Algorithm Into A Visual Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper presents work that draws on and extends the work of others, in particular Andrienko et al (2011) and Laube (2014), to develop a framework for the modelling of information on movement. We have carefully expressed the field/object and Eulerian/Lagrangian perspectives in formal terms, and have demonstrated sometimes quite subtle distinctions between these two dichotomies.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This classification has contributed to the development of data mining and visualisation of movement. Andrienko et al (2011) proposed a conceptual framework for movement with atomic spatial, temporal, and object components. The paper mainly focused on an object perspective but their analysis also covered properties of locations (spatial and temporal).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Joh et al, 2002;Kisilevich et al, 2010;Andrienko et al, 2011;Vrotsou et al, 2011). However, these approaches usually rely on a movingwindow in time to construct trajectories.…”
Section: Trajectory Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%