2019
DOI: 10.1002/pamm.201900100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A concept for aortic dissection with fluid‐structure‐crack interaction

Abstract: In aortic dissection, the layers composing the aorta rupture, allowing blood to enter the vessel wall. This process is modeled applying a monolithic fluid‐structure interaction framework, formulating the Navier‐Stokes equations for incompressible flows as well as the mixed finite strain elastodynamics equations in the Lagrangian frame of reference. Continuous test‐ and trial function spaces are employed in the whole domain, rendering the coupling straightforward. Within this contribution, a predefined function… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This leads to an inherent tight coupling of physical fields, but unfortunately comes with an increased implementation 1 Email address: schussnig@tugraz.at, corresponding author effort, possibly unusual data structures and more involved preconditioners. Several variants to enforce the interface conditions include, e.g., Langrange multipliers [8,[33][34][35][36], Nitsche's method [37][38][39], mortar techniques [28,40], penalty approaches [41][42][43] or formulations enforcing interface conditions via the function space choice [44][45][46][47][48][49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to an inherent tight coupling of physical fields, but unfortunately comes with an increased implementation 1 Email address: schussnig@tugraz.at, corresponding author effort, possibly unusual data structures and more involved preconditioners. Several variants to enforce the interface conditions include, e.g., Langrange multipliers [8,[33][34][35][36], Nitsche's method [37][38][39], mortar techniques [28,40], penalty approaches [41][42][43] or formulations enforcing interface conditions via the function space choice [44][45][46][47][48][49].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%