2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.05.076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Concentration-Dependent Liquid Phase Separation Can Cause Toxicity upon Increased Protein Expression

Abstract: SummaryMultiple human diseases are associated with a liquid-to-solid phase transition resulting in the formation of amyloid fibers or protein aggregates. Here, we present an alternative mechanism for cellular toxicity based on a concentration-dependent liquid-liquid demixing. Analyzing proteins that are toxic when their concentration is increased in yeast reveals that they share physicochemical properties with proteins that participate in physiological liquid-liquid demixing in the cell. Increasing the concent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
343
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(371 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
13
343
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It might be proposed then, that the RNA binding Mip6 is also playing that role, and while it binds Mex67 through its RRM4, the other RRMs are still binding RNA as we showed and thus would be holding RNA and further shuttling with Mex67 to the nucleus especially as Mip6 doesn't have the capacity to shuttle on its own. This hypothesis is also supported by the fact that in vivo Mip6 localizes homogeneously both in nucleus and in cytoplasm at normal growth conditions (Bolognesi et al, 2016), however when Mex67 was inactivated in vivo, most Mip6-GFP was retained in the nucleus. Additionally, a non-published work from in Susana Rodriguez Navarro lab have also provided evidence for Mip6 co-purifying with proteins involved in mRNA export and known to interact with Mex67 as it exports the nucleus like Sac3 (a part of the TREX-2 complex on the nuclear face of the NPC), and Dbp5 (localizes at the cytoplasmic face of the NPC) using TAP purification.…”
Section: Mip6 Function In Vivo As a Possible Novel Adaptor Protein Fosupporting
confidence: 60%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It might be proposed then, that the RNA binding Mip6 is also playing that role, and while it binds Mex67 through its RRM4, the other RRMs are still binding RNA as we showed and thus would be holding RNA and further shuttling with Mex67 to the nucleus especially as Mip6 doesn't have the capacity to shuttle on its own. This hypothesis is also supported by the fact that in vivo Mip6 localizes homogeneously both in nucleus and in cytoplasm at normal growth conditions (Bolognesi et al, 2016), however when Mex67 was inactivated in vivo, most Mip6-GFP was retained in the nucleus. Additionally, a non-published work from in Susana Rodriguez Navarro lab have also provided evidence for Mip6 co-purifying with proteins involved in mRNA export and known to interact with Mex67 as it exports the nucleus like Sac3 (a part of the TREX-2 complex on the nuclear face of the NPC), and Dbp5 (localizes at the cytoplasmic face of the NPC) using TAP purification.…”
Section: Mip6 Function In Vivo As a Possible Novel Adaptor Protein Fosupporting
confidence: 60%
“…One study that looked at the cellular toxicity caused by a concentration-dependent liquid phase separation upon increased protein expression, suggested that the strong over-expression of the dosage-sensitive Mip6 protein indeed changes its localization to cytoplasmic foci impairing cell growth, reducing the global translation rates, and causing toxicity (Bolognesi et al, 2016). The study also found that these cytoplasmic foci contained RNA and demonstrated that at least two of the RRM domains of Mip6 are required for the cytoplasmic focus formation.…”
Section: Mip6 Additional Role During Cellular Stressmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations