Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1997
DOI: 10.1086/118624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Computerized Model of Large-Scale Visual Interstellar Extinction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

20
229
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 186 publications
(251 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
20
229
2
Order By: Relevance
“…5). Fitzgerald 1968) in the routine by Hakkila et al (1997). The analytical model tends to overpredict the extinction by an order of magnitude, especially at larger distances.…”
Section: Testing the Models And Further Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…5). Fitzgerald 1968) in the routine by Hakkila et al (1997). The analytical model tends to overpredict the extinction by an order of magnitude, especially at larger distances.…”
Section: Testing the Models And Further Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Then we proceed to a few of the rare neutron stars with well known distances, having also small error bars for the absorbing N(H) derived by X-ray observations. As Hakkila et al (1997) note, different studies do not agree precisely with each other due to the various applied Hobbs et al (1988); a log(N(Nai)) = 10.6 < 11 Ferlet et al (1985) formula was doubted by Welty et al (1994) Kharchenko et al (2005a,b). To convert the reddening E(B −V ) we apply the formula by Paresce (1984): N (H) = 5.5 × 10 21 E(B − V ) cm −2 .…”
Section: Testing the Models And Further Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations