1975
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1635707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Computerized Information System for Pathology

Abstract: This paper describes a Computerized Information System for Pathology (CISP) capable of storing, retrieving and correlating essential information in pathology reports.Reports are entered in text form using established diagnostic terms recognizable in the system’s dictionary. Although some pre-editing of the report may be necessary, the comprehensive dictionary minimizes this effort. Dictionaries provide the vocabulary for a language which enables an economic storage of essential information in a compact and eas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1976
1976
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coding system presented in this paper shows some advantages over those reported by others, mainly because it makes it possible to store each histopathological finding in five bytes, allowing to record a large number of information in a relatively small space of memory. A second advantage is that our code can be integrated with other coding systems, such as the SNOP [4] and the SNOMed [10], when a more analytical description of the tissue-pathological changes is needed. In addition, all of the possible associations between the variables under study can easily be analized by statistical programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The coding system presented in this paper shows some advantages over those reported by others, mainly because it makes it possible to store each histopathological finding in five bytes, allowing to record a large number of information in a relatively small space of memory. A second advantage is that our code can be integrated with other coding systems, such as the SNOP [4] and the SNOMed [10], when a more analytical description of the tissue-pathological changes is needed. In addition, all of the possible associations between the variables under study can easily be analized by statistical programs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, several systems have been developed for processing histopathological data utilizing different coding systems. Among the most widely used codes are: SNOP (Systematized Nomenclature of Pathology) [4], the most widely used, is based on the grouping of the diagnostic sentences into four categories according to the topography (T), the morphology (M), the etiology (E) and the altered function (F); SNOMed (Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine) representing a revision and extension of the SNOP system to the medical field including two additional categories, one for• syndromes and complex diseases (D) and the second for administrative and therapeutic procedures (P); CISP (Computerized Information System for Pathology) [10] storing the cytological, autoptical and surgical reports using established diagnostic terms recognizable in the system's dictionary; H-ICDA [1], a system which classifies diagnoses according to the topographical regions Rome, Italy) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The file structure is a key issue for clinical information systems [31]. Data-base management systems are in use [1,18,20], tree structures [3], problem-oriented structures [27], time-oriented structures [7,10,31], text-oriented files [2,14] and rectangular files [8,12]. For registries of chronic diseases like malignant tumors, the time-oriented structure is most appropriate [24,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sequence of the processes that is flexible enough to meet users' demands also is an important fea• ture. Other factors that lower the threshold of man• machine interface and thus encourage pathologists would include (I) immediate accessibility of the data base [2,4,5,19,20,29], (2) interactive dialogue that permits machine•assisted operation [6,10,14,15,19,20], (3) storage of the essential minimum information, resorting to hand•written documents for details, (4) ease of cor• rection and updating of data, (5) automatic coding capability which eliminates need for coding by hand of diagnostic terms [S,10,16,IS,20,21,2S,30], and (6) workability frOIn the very begiruling without prelinlinary construction of a thesaurus for coding. The speed of data acquisition and the number of records that can be stored are of secondary importance.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%