2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29891-3_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Computer Vision Pipeline that Uses Thermal and RGB Images for the Recognition of Holstein Cattle

Abstract: The monitoring of farm animals is important as it allows farmers keeping track of the performance indicators and any signs of health issues, which is useful to improve the production of milk, meat, eggs and others. In Europe, bovine identification is mostly dependent upon the electronic ID/RFID ear tags, as opposed to branding and tattooing. The RFID based ear-tagging approach has been called into question because of implementation and management costs, physical damage and animal welfare concerns. In this pape… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…exploiting manually-delineated features extracted on the coat [26] (similar to a later work by Li, W. et al [25]), which was outperformed by a deep approach using convolutional neural networks extracting features from entire image sequences [27,28,29], similar to [48,49]. More recently, there have been works that integrate multiple views of cattle faces for identification [45], utilise thermal imagery for background subtraction as a pre-processing technique for a standard CNN-based classification pipeline [50], and detect cattle presence from UAV-acquired imagery [45]. In this work we continue to exploit dorsal biometric features from coat patterns exhibited by Holstein and Holstein-Friesian breeds as they provably provide sufficient distinction across populations.…”
Section: Automated Cattle Biometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…exploiting manually-delineated features extracted on the coat [26] (similar to a later work by Li, W. et al [25]), which was outperformed by a deep approach using convolutional neural networks extracting features from entire image sequences [27,28,29], similar to [48,49]. More recently, there have been works that integrate multiple views of cattle faces for identification [45], utilise thermal imagery for background subtraction as a pre-processing technique for a standard CNN-based classification pipeline [50], and detect cattle presence from UAV-acquired imagery [45]. In this work we continue to exploit dorsal biometric features from coat patterns exhibited by Holstein and Holstein-Friesian breeds as they provably provide sufficient distinction across populations.…”
Section: Automated Cattle Biometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, body recognition methods have been developed to identify cows within a herd using computer vision and deep learning techniques. Within the proposed methods are cattle recognition from the side (Bhole et al, 2019), from behind (Qiao et al, 2019), different angles (de Lima Weber et al, 2020) or from the top (Andrew et al, 2019). The latter was proposed to identify and recognize Holstein and Friesian cattle using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) (Andrew et al, 2017(Andrew et al, , 019, 2020a(Andrew et al, , 2020b.…”
Section: Cattlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter was proposed to identify and recognize Holstein and Friesian cattle using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) (Andrew et al, 2017(Andrew et al, , 019, 2020a(Andrew et al, , 2020b. Bhole et al (2019) proposed an extra step for cow recognition from the side by recording IRTIs to ease the image segmentation and remove the background.…”
Section: Cattlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-touch identity recognition We investigated the primary research methods in the field of cattle recognition. From the retina [1] and iris [2] of the cattle's eyes to the nose print and the overall individual [3,4], existing algorithms are predominantly focused on artificially captivity environments, making them challenging to apply in the large-scale wild environment. Due to various environmental factors in the wild, such as different lighting conditions and diverse orientations of cattle faces, the quality of cattle images captured in wild environments is suboptimal, and the background is highly intricate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%