2001
DOI: 10.1080/10255840108908019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Computer-simulation Model Relating Bone-cell Metabolism to Mechanical Adaptation of Trabecular Architecture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mathematical equations were introduced to quantify relationships. 16,34 The change in bone mass at a particular trabecular surface location x at time t is determined by…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mathematical equations were introduced to quantify relationships. 16,34 The change in bone mass at a particular trabecular surface location x at time t is determined by…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is illustrated in Fig 2. Applying 2D computer simulation methods we showed that this theory provides a qualitative explanation for both modeling and remodeling. 16,34 We later studied the theory using a 3D finite element analysis (FEA) computational model and showed that it explains growth and maintenance of 3D trabecular-like architectures with realistic physiological and morphological characteristics. Also the adaptation of these structures to alternative loading conditions, and the morphological effects of osteoporosis and medical intervention, could be explained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these are assumptions, we have demonstrated in earlier studies that this model can explain a large number of trabecular bone features (Ruimerman et al 2001) and that its results are not strongly dependent on the choice of the exact load parameter sensed by the osteocytes (Ruimerman et al 2005) or even the assumed regulation mechanism (van Oers et al 2010). In the present study, we used a 2D model, which limits the structures that can be represented.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a square mesh of 5 mm 2 , with an element size of 50 × 50 µm. The mesh was loaded statically with 1.5 MPa compression in both horizontal and vertical directions (perpendicular to the mesh), which for a linear elastic material represents the maximum SED rate of a dynamic load of 0.75 MPa at 1 Hz (Ruimerman et al 2001). This external force F was varied to represent changes in mechanical load.…”
Section: D Fea Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation