1995
DOI: 10.1107/s0108767394011517
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computer simulation approach for the calculation of diffuse intensity distributions from crystals undergoing the 2H to 6H transformation by layer displacement mechanism

Abstract: Limitations of the Markovian chain approach for the calculation of diffuse intensity distributions from crystals undergoing the 2H to 6//transformation by non-random insertion of layer displacement faults are pointed out. A computer simulation approach for the numerical computation of the diffuse intensity disributions in such situations is presented. The numerically computed intensity distributions along diffuse streaks, obtained by taking Fourier transforms of the pair correlations determined from simulated … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Use of Monte Carlo techniques leads to the same results as those obtained by analytical treatment for random distribution of stacking faults (Berliner & Werner, 1986). However, for non-random distribution of faults, the Monte Carlo results have been shown to be different from those obtained analytically using the difference equation approach especially for large fault probabilities (Kabra & Pandey, 1995. The main difference between the analytical and Monte Carlo approaches is that the latter leads to the arrest of the transformation for an intermediate value of non-random fault probability less than the value of unity required for completion of the transformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Use of Monte Carlo techniques leads to the same results as those obtained by analytical treatment for random distribution of stacking faults (Berliner & Werner, 1986). However, for non-random distribution of faults, the Monte Carlo results have been shown to be different from those obtained analytically using the difference equation approach especially for large fault probabilities (Kabra & Pandey, 1995. The main difference between the analytical and Monte Carlo approaches is that the latter leads to the arrest of the transformation for an intermediate value of non-random fault probability less than the value of unity required for completion of the transformation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…3(a). crystals which always retain longrange correlations (Sato, 1969;Pandey et al, 1980a;Kabra & Pandey, 1995). For > 0.5, the correlation length again starts increasing and, at = 1, the ABABAB .…”
Section: Random Deformation Faultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several studies about the effect of SFs in the close-packed structure of polycrystalline metals ranging from theoretical calculations (Berliner & Werner, 1986) to computer simulations (Kabra & Pandey, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simulation is similar to those used to study the hcp to fcc transition in Co and its alloys. 28,29 The model transformation was a effected in small domains picked at random within the 1350 planes of the film. A close-packed plane was coded by p ϭ1(A),2(B), or 3(C) and could be slid via…”
Section: A B C a B C A B C ⇓ A B A B C A B C A ⇓ A B A B C B C A B ⇓ mentioning
confidence: 99%