1980
DOI: 10.3758/bf03208327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computer-controlled cardiotachometer

Abstract: A versatile display system for presenting heart rate information is described. The display has a table with 10 rows and 50 columns. This 10 by 50 matrix contains all integers from o to 499, so that it can display the instantaneous R•R intervals of a rat's EKG to the nearest millisecond. At each beat 1 of 10 vertically and 1 of 50 horizontally arranged indicator lights are turned on to provide the coordinates for reading the table. Either beat-to-beat or averaged heart rate or period is displayed. Small and lar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1981
1981
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A PDP/8 computer used a PAL/8 program to analyze the ECG, to control a cardiotachometer (Klosterhalfen, 1980), and to calculate heart rate (HR) on the basis of averaged R-R intervals: R waves produced Schmitt trigger interrupts which were accepted for calculating beats per minute only when they occurred at intervals of more than 100 and less than 250 ms and when they did not occur at the onset of the acoustical stimuli, the time at which most of the rare movement artifacts were observed.…”
Section: General Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A PDP/8 computer used a PAL/8 program to analyze the ECG, to control a cardiotachometer (Klosterhalfen, 1980), and to calculate heart rate (HR) on the basis of averaged R-R intervals: R waves produced Schmitt trigger interrupts which were accepted for calculating beats per minute only when they occurred at intervals of more than 100 and less than 250 ms and when they did not occur at the onset of the acoustical stimuli, the time at which most of the rare movement artifacts were observed.…”
Section: General Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%