2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2014.05.433
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computer-based automated algorithm for assessing acinar cell loss after experimental pancreatitis

Abstract: The change in exocrine mass is an important parameter to follow in experimental models of pancreatic injury and regeneration. However, at present, the quantitative assessment of exocrine content by histology is tedious and operatordependent, requiring manual assessment of acinar area on serial pancreatic sections. In this study, we utilized a novel computer-generated learning algorithm to construct an accurate and rapid method of quantifying acinar content. The algorithm works by learning differences in pixel … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work aims to identify the image patches from the images with labels, that is, it predicts the unknown instance (image patch) labels from the known bag (image) labels. A supervised learning segmentation method using pixel-wise classification has also been proposed and applied for detection of pancreatic acinar cells in histopathological images (18)(19)(20). The features in the classification are defined with the multi-scale intensity neighborhoods in each pixel.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The work aims to identify the image patches from the images with labels, that is, it predicts the unknown instance (image patch) labels from the known bag (image) labels. A supervised learning segmentation method using pixel-wise classification has also been proposed and applied for detection of pancreatic acinar cells in histopathological images (18)(19)(20). The features in the classification are defined with the multi-scale intensity neighborhoods in each pixel.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of superpixel generated with different methods. Original image is overlapped with ground-truth islet boundary in (a); superpixels generated from SLIC(19) and proposed method are shown in (b) and (c) respectively, where the boundaries of all the generated superpixels are overlapped on the original image. In both (b) and (c), an area containing islet boundary is magnified at the left-bottom of the image, in order to show the object adherent performances of different generation methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%