2012
DOI: 10.1074/mcp.m111.013045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Computational Tool to Detect and Avoid Redundancy in Selected Reaction Monitoring

Abstract: Selected reaction monitoring (SRM), also called multiple reaction monitoring, has become an invaluable tool for targeted quantitative proteomic analyses, but its application can be compromised by nonoptimal selection of transitions. In particular, complex backgrounds may cause ambiguities in SRM measurement results because peptides with interfering transitions similar to those of the target peptide may be present in the sample. Here, we developed a computer program, the SRMCollider, that calculates nonredundan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
95
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each target peptide, the number of transitions that were interfered with was recorded and later used to compute the statistics. The detailed algorithm for the computation of the product ion interferences will be the subject of a separate study (51). This algorithm essentially expands on the principle of the "unique ion signatures" described by Sherman et al (29) by taking into account peptide RT as an additional constraint for the calculation of fragment ion interferences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each target peptide, the number of transitions that were interfered with was recorded and later used to compute the statistics. The detailed algorithm for the computation of the product ion interferences will be the subject of a separate study (51). This algorithm essentially expands on the principle of the "unique ion signatures" described by Sherman et al (29) by taking into account peptide RT as an additional constraint for the calculation of fragment ion interferences.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such fragment ion interferences can result in excess peak area quantitation contributed by the interfering precursor, lower intensity correlation with library, peak shape, and co-elution scores as well as computed probability. The number of interferences can be reduced by use of experimental designs with narrow precursor windows (7) or by selection of library assay fragment ions predicted to be unique to their precursor ion within a range of retention time using programs such as SRMCollider (21). Interferences are nevertheless inevitable because the chromatography and peptides in the sample, including semitryptic and modified peptides, can vary from run to run.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, false assignments are easily identified since the sequences of the peptides present in the samples are known and second, because the fragmentation of relatively high abundant peptides generally produces higher quality fragmentation spectra, which simplifies peptide identifications [106]. At this stage, tools like AuDIT [121] can filter out interfering transitions, or the SRM collider tool [122,123] can identify redundant transitions for a given peptide considering the specific proteome background under investigation. Estimation of the FDR for the use in SRM assays is critical for the objective analysis of large SRM datasets.…”
Section: Error Estimation For Srm Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%