2018
DOI: 10.1007/s42241-018-0048-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A computational study on system dynamics of an ocean current turbine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a wide range of wave period, for which the FKT system might not be able to work well. It implies that the 3-AML design is not a robust one, compared to the 2-AML design as shown by Wu [23], if the polyester type of mooring line is employed and the line diameter is small. If the diameter is increased to 0.1 m, the dynamic response is much improved, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Results: 3-aml System With Surface Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is a wide range of wave period, for which the FKT system might not be able to work well. It implies that the 3-AML design is not a robust one, compared to the 2-AML design as shown by Wu [23], if the polyester type of mooring line is employed and the line diameter is small. If the diameter is increased to 0.1 m, the dynamic response is much improved, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Results: 3-aml System With Surface Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, the following discussion will focus on system pitching motion only. Before proceeding to the discussion, it should be first mentioned that the system has a natural period of about 5 sec in pitching motion [21], which has been verified by Wu et al [23].…”
Section: Results: 2-aml System With Surface Wavesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Floating Kuroshio Turbine (FKT) system (Figure 2) was the collaboration by NTU and NTOU [4]. A laboratory flume test demonstrated that a 1/25 model could generate 850 W of power when the model was towed at a speed of 1.45 m/s [5]. A feasibility study for a 1/5 model has been conducted; it is expected that the larger model would generate higher power up to 20 kW.…”
Section: Development For Ocean Current Energy Harvestermentioning
confidence: 99%