2007 2nd IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications 2007
DOI: 10.1109/iciea.2007.4318405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Computational Model of Magnetic Drug Targeting in Blood Vessel using Finite Element Method

Abstract: This paper purposes a numerical model of drug targeting using wedge-like magnetic device. The magnetic liquids play a crucial role as drug carriers in the human body. The wedgelike magnetic is also utilized to focus magnetic liquids. The Finite Element Method, FEM, is applied to solve two important sets of partial differential equation. Electromagnetic field is described by Maxwell equation and velocity field is expressed by Navier-Stoke equation. The resultshows the potential to target drug in the tumor cell … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The static case for Maxwell’s equation is defined by × Η = J · Β = 0 Β = μ 0 μ r ( Η + Μ ) where μ is the permeability (μ = μ 0 μ r ), Β is the magnetic induction, Η is magnetic field strength, Μ is the magnetization vector, and J is the induced current density. It is worth noting that B = ∇ × A and ∇ · A = 0, where A is the magnetic vector potential and ∇ is the gradient operator.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The static case for Maxwell’s equation is defined by × Η = J · Β = 0 Β = μ 0 μ r ( Η + Μ ) where μ is the permeability (μ = μ 0 μ r ), Β is the magnetic induction, Η is magnetic field strength, Μ is the magnetization vector, and J is the induced current density. It is worth noting that B = ∇ × A and ∇ · A = 0, where A is the magnetic vector potential and ∇ is the gradient operator.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that B = ∇ × A and ∇ · A = 0, where A is the magnetic vector potential and ∇ is the gradient operator. The following equations can then be derived: × A = μ ( Η + Μ ) × ( μ -1 × A ) = × Η + × Μ × ( μ -1 × A Μ ) = J Since this work considers a 2D model, eq can be rewritten as · ( μ -1 A γ ) = J where γ replaces M , magnetization of the ferrofluid, and is approximated as normalγ = true( α arctan true( β A ( x , y ) x true) , α arctan true( β A …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two noninvasive ways to improve the situation: improve the external magnets to provide stronger and deeper magnetic gradients or optimizing the magnetic carriers to react more strongly to a magnetic gradient. Optimization of permanent and electro‐magnets to increase the strength and depth of magnetic gradients has been reported in Refs . In our own work, we showed that semi‐definite optimization tools could be used to design and implement Halbach‐array permanent magnets that provide improved pulling or pushing forces on magnetic nanoparticles .…”
Section: Magnet Design and Control To Reach Deep Targetsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Recently, magnet shaping has been employed in the design of permanent magnets [48], [49] and electromagnets [35], [36], [50] to improve magnetic gradients and thus enhance pull forces. Halbach arrays for near surface magnetic focusing have been demonstrated in [28], [51].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%